Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Veilguard did so well the studio might close i would say it's a success. The devs get their money, the customer's don't have to see another game from them (i would consider it great even) and the company that decided someone need that crap of a game loses money (great), guess it was really great if you consider it this way.
Veilguard did so great that they fired Corine Busche and they are shutting down Edmonton end of February, and it might be fiscally impossible to keep Bioware itself open at this stage as well. You're either a fool, or you're a plant. In either case, you're doing a disservice to yourself.
Avowed and Veilguard are living examples.
go woke go broke !
I think the game identifies as a worse Skyrim,
Great games make a studio great. But when the studio no longer creates great games they past successes are just that in the past.
A great game makes the studio.