Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
now have to find another way to make money
It's so funny and sad at the same time - they create awesome Deadfire, it initially underperforms, so they decide to make a game better fitting for a lowest common denominator. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, Baldur's Gate 3 comes out and its sales are great. Meanwhile, Josh Sawyer says that Deadfire had a very good slow burn and in the end it sold well.
I bought Pillars of Eternity Adventurer Edition, and I was the fan of the universe ever since. But this is where they lost me as a fan.
Basically - game had to be dumbed down in devs' opinion. I hope that at least some of them are silently weeping looking at BG 3 sales numbers, regretting changing the formula of the newest game set in Eora.
Yeah, it definitely feels strange, especially as one of our companion characters seems to be a dwarf.
I just hope Avowed is an exception and Obsidian will return to isometric RTwP/turn-based games. Baldur's Gate 3 and Owlcat's Pathfinder games & WH 40K: Rogue Trader prove that isometric party-based RPGs are viable.
I'll likely give Avowed a try eventually, but my expectations for the game are pretty low at this point.