Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
^ Explain to me how not picking the gender you wanna be labeled as makes more sense than having non immersive nouns that change nothing in the game added to the wrong sex while anything, it's immersion breaking.
In reality you can't create a new character but in game you can.
If I wanted to be regarded as SHE and I was a HE, I'd make a female character since 1200% chances are I'd try to make my male character as "She" as possible, so i'd just pick a female character, you can then roleplay by having her look more manly if you're into that.
I can think of one game that drove out what was originally planned a male character and replaced with a female character. But that's not the real concern if you just look at it by its cover. The director to that game hates white and Asian males. She's a black female who calls Asians "white's adjacents (i.e. next door neighbors)"
Not many care apparently.
Because the 80% comes from media outlets, not having taken into account scores from any of regular gamers. Remember that Canadian-hosted game thinggy that happened back in December '24 where no gamers' votes were allowed? Right now is not the time to look at the average Avowed score.
Metacritic doesn't let people score until launch date. It's not that they "aren't taken into account", it's that you literally can't review it until the 18th.
Open Critic as well.
Won't be "optional" when they make the NPCs they/them as well. You can point out the individual or two outliers in specific games to make a point, but that would only prove you'll use them changing the male/female option now to point at it later when NPC enmass are now they/thems. Options mean I should have the option to not engage in this. Currently that option is being stripped.
What I will comment on is the fact that it is optional right now (I understood that part). I didn't touch any pronoun options while making my game. And both times, when I made a male and female character, did I end up with the right pronouns in game. So there is no problem here
Surely you are able to provide names and numbers to back this claim up. Show your work.
What you mean is the inevitable review bomb the chuds are planning can't happen until the 18th.
I am sorry I misunderstood your position on the matter. I heard they made it a setting after backlash which might be why you didn't see it. But I won't find out until the game goes on sale atleast 50%.
My work? I am just another gamer. Surely I don't need to be Elon or Trump to expose what USAID was up to either right? Or did I have to be Biden to cover it all up?
Or let me put it this way, do I need to be Matt Hansen to think what he thinks? Or do I need to be part of Avowed team to know it was comprised almost entirely of DEI driven females?
When the credit rolls on Avowed, look at how many female "devs" are in the credit section.
oh wait. You don't get everything in life just cos you think you should, i guess that's why.