Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
25h/play-through
"RPG"
lmao
I do not count on Mort when deciding if a game is worth playing at all though - he tends to focus on combat, progression and plentitude of options and is not so reliable to identify and point out if the game struggles in storytelling, character building, dialogues etc.
One of the reviews that complements Mort's review with what he is missing :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsHEJpbvaOM
Yes, that is what I meant. I trust he is no paid shill,he genuinely feels what he says - but I do not consider him a good advice to decide about a purchase.
Once you know you want to play certain game - then Mort is a great source of information about it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/137hgbn/showgunners_review_after_100_mortismal_gaming/
Hilarious reviewer
He used to do good work but sadly discredited himself way too much withhis veilguard review. (A bit like the studios of the games he is playing I guess.) :)
Interesting... Good to know.
LOL, he is completely unreliable then.