Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"Are we there yet?"
"Are we there yet?"
"Are we there yet?"
"Are we there yet?"
It will happen in may. Just wait, please.
This requires a major patch probably...
Another thing is hunger balance, this should be fixed easily, i like how they listened to people and added disable option for aging, but why they just don't extend to like 100 days for example?
I wouldn't get worried so much, the game has huge potential acknowledged by people who bought this and devs, the reactions showed this.
But if you play for longer then 5 hours you see there is a lot to be done.
At first it looks like it's more polished then Sims, and in some cases it is, but then you have a load of problems sitting underneath a shell of a good product.
What you are proposing does not seem to me to be the best approach to improving a game in early access. I would even say it's the best way to sabotage a project.
I mean, if you have a roadmap for fixing bugs and adding or extending mechanics, I don't know how introducing continuous small changes at short intervals of time can help when it's obvious that those quick fixes may be introducing new bugs or incompatibilities when the big update is included or before applying it.
I think that this way of acting and planning the development of the game is typical of western companies (hence the amount of bugs at the launch of the games) while in the Far East they are usually more exaustive and the games usually come out without bugs or with such a minimal amount that makes western developers blush with shame.
For 40 buckeroos.......
But you can clearly see that the majority of this sub is totally cool with spending money for half baked products.
Your daily fanboy/fangirl BS of people who haven't played anything else in their lifes than smartphone games and maybe Sims tops
What a giant pile of BS.
Where did you get this info from?
Any official source or just your gut feeling?
Besides that, how does this justify the 40 dollar price tag for a game which doesn't even offer 20 dollar content?
If you really believe they would release this game for 80 bucks, you also believe in santa clause.
edit: Oops, this user doesn't even own the game :D
Smart move though.