People complaining about sexuality/identity options

[PurpleMadness]

Do you even know the target audience for this kinda game? like, its literally the "woke" crowd, and i don't even say that as a bad thing, theres a game for everyone, but complaining about it is like complaining that call of duty has guns.

[R for Reload]

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

Originally posted by R for Reload:

Man has no real argument so he's given up back to insulting.

truth hurts doesn't it?

Women are generally more likely to report higher rates of certain STDs, such as chlamydia and gonorrhea, due to biological factors that make them more susceptible to infections. However, men often report higher rates of other STDs, like syphilis, making it difficult to determine definitively which gender has more STDs overall.

syphilis being the std that has killed a lot of heterosexual men back in the day including many famous heterosexual men.

You have no dog in this fight.

Just back down and sit at your computer like a fool.

Yawn
I already had this argument and won
https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304751
"STI positivity was 35% among gay and bisexual cisgender men, 15% among heterosexual cisgender men, 11% among cisgender women, 25% among transgender women, 13% among gay and bisexual transgender men, 3% among heterosexual transgender men, and 26% among nonbinary people."

[MadFiq]

Originally posted by PurpleMadness:

Originally posted by MadFiq:

I don't really mind having ♥♥♥♥ in any game that i played as long it doesn't shove it down my throat. Having an option to opt in or out of this type of content, population slider would be nice. After all, this is a life sim game. People should be able to create, control and manage their simulated world they way they like it. Having a forced enabled ♥♥♥♥ in a life sim game is also a freedom breaker.

Literally nothing is forced, the game allow you to set things up, you would know that if you had actually played the game instead of being busy hating

Yup i know. In current state, it does. I just doesn't like it when it randomly spawn in more and more later on (if they decide to have them spawn randomly later) and not having any control over it. Just like how sims 4 did.

[Dakota]

Originally posted by Azrael:

Originally posted by ddblue0:

I agree. I'm not gay myself but I feel like if gay stuff were totally absent it'd be weird and less realistic because *gasp* gay people do exist. I'm not a big fan of having my games censored for me.

If it triggers you to see it, then maybe a true-to-life life sim isn't the game for you.

You do understand that realistically out of 100 people 2 would be gay, right? and Out of 100 00 people only 2 would be trans, right?
The game is perfectly representing them statistically.

lol "banned"

[CLUTCH]

Originally posted by R for Reload:

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

truth hurts doesn't it?

Women are generally more likely to report higher rates of certain STDs, such as chlamydia and gonorrhea, due to biological factors that make them more susceptible to infections. However, men often report higher rates of other STDs, like syphilis, making it difficult to determine definitively which gender has more STDs overall.

syphilis being the std that has killed a lot of heterosexual men back in the day including many famous heterosexual men.

You have no dog in this fight.

Just back down and sit at your computer like a fool.

Yawn
I already had this argument and won
https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304751
"STI positivity was 35% among gay and bisexual cisgender men, 15% among heterosexual cisgender men, 11% among cisgender women, 25% among transgender women, 13% among gay and bisexual transgender men, 3% among heterosexual transgender men, and 26% among nonbinary people."

YAWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!

The fact that you don't understand is that sexual contact hetero or ♥♥♥♥ can cause a disease. Sometimes life threatening.

You trying to use percentages as a a bias to your phobias.

And only 3% heterosexual transgender men? That is the lowest percentage in your posted study.

Since you are all about low percentages are you part of that 3%?

[R for Reload]

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

Originally posted by R for Reload:

Yawn
I already had this argument and won
https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304751
"STI positivity was 35% among gay and bisexual cisgender men, 15% among heterosexual cisgender men, 11% among cisgender women, 25% among transgender women, 13% among gay and bisexual transgender men, 3% among heterosexual transgender men, and 26% among nonbinary people."

YAWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!

The fact that you don't understand is that sexual contact hetero or ♥♥♥♥ can cause a disease. Sometimes life threatening.

You trying to use percentages as a a bias to your phobias.

And only 3% heterosexual transgender men? That is the lowest percentage in your posted study.

Since you are all about low percentages are you part of that 3%?

:tank:

heterosexual transgender men are women with a pseudo phallus stitched on who have sex with women.
of course they aren't getting STIs
It's effectively like a women using a dildo on herself and getting an STI from it, it's extremely unlikely lol.

I am not a transgender.

[krugg.the.gamer]

I'm for against "woke" after the past few years of awful games, but how can anyone really justify being mad at this one on either side of the argument? You can literally edit the entire world you're playing to make it exactly what you want. If you're seeing things you don't want... you picked it. So what's your problem? A life sim... should have all that stuff in it. Much like in real life, when I see something I don't like... I don't interact with it, because I don't like it. Why are you interacting with things you don't like?

[CLUTCH]

Originally posted by R for Reload:

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

YAWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!

The fact that you don't understand is that sexual contact hetero or ♥♥♥♥ can cause a disease. Sometimes life threatening.

You trying to use percentages as a a bias to your phobias.

And only 3% heterosexual transgender men? That is the lowest percentage in your posted study.

Since you are all about low percentages are you part of that 3%?

heterosexual transgender men are women with a pseudo phallus stitched on who have sex with women.
of course they aren't getting STIs
It's effectively like a women using a dildo on herself and getting an STI from it, it's extremely unlikely lol.

Wow! Thats great ok!!

So back to your point.

Just because heterosexual men dont have to take "prep" doesn't make them any better.

Heterosexual men have died from sexually contracted diseases and to this day take protective measures to prevent them.

Homosexual man also take preventative measures as well.

One side or the other is neither better or worse and you trying to point out "prep" still makes you look like a fool.


YAWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!

[R for Reload]

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

Originally posted by R for Reload:

heterosexual transgender men are women with a pseudo phallus stitched on who have sex with women.
of course they aren't getting STIs
It's effectively like a women using a dildo on herself and getting an STI from it, it's extremely unlikely lol.

Wow! Thats great ok!!

So back to your point.

Just because heterosexual men dont have to take "prep" doesn't make them any better.

Heterosexual men have died from sexually contracted diseases and to this day take protective measures to prevent them.

Homosexual man also take preventative measures as well.

One side or the other is neither better or worse and you trying to point out "prep" still makes you look like a fool.


YAWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!

Okay, But homosexuals die more on average to STIs then hetrosexual men?
What is your point?

[CLUTCH]

Originally posted by R for Reload:

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

Wow! Thats great ok!!

So back to your point.

Just because heterosexual men dont have to take "prep" doesn't make them any better.

Heterosexual men have died from sexually contracted diseases and to this day take protective measures to prevent them.

Homosexual man also take preventative measures as well.

One side or the other is neither better or worse and you trying to point out "prep" still makes you look like a fool.


YAWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!

Okay, But homosexuals die more on average to STIs then hetrosexual men?
What is your point?

My point is there is more research and development involved in heterosexual stds from the 1920s compared to homosexual research that was halted or avoided in the 1980s by the governement in which they proceeded to let them die.

That. Is. My. Point.

It doesn't make YOU any better.

STFD AND STFU!

[R for Reload]

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

Originally posted by R for Reload:

Okay, But homosexuals die more on average to STIs then hetrosexual men?
What is your point?

My point is there is more research and development involved in heterosexual stds from the 1920s compared to homosexual research that was halted or avoided in the 1980s by the governement in which they proceeded to let them die.

That. Is. My. Point.

It doesn't make YOU any better.

STFD AND STFU!

okay but these are modern statistics not 1980s statistics.

[Pinhead Larry]

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

Originally posted by R for Reload:

Okay, But homosexuals die more on average to STIs then hetrosexual men?
What is your point?

My point is there is more research and development involved in heterosexual stds from the 1920s compared to homosexual research that was halted or avoided in the 1980s by the governement in which they proceeded to let them die.

That. Is. My. Point.

It doesn't make YOU any better.

STFD AND STFU!

Dumb inbred bigots will latch on to any misrepresented statistic that's convenient for their bigotry. Don't waste too much energy trying to convince that guy otherwise, the only person who can make someone else stop being stupid is themselves, if they actually gave a rip about homosexual people they'd have put in the effort to educate themselves and actually double check their own claims like you and I have.

Otherwise they'd know that HIV specifically has such a stigma that it goes majorly under reported in heterosexual people. Who knew that vilifying HIV as "the gay disease" in a predominantly christian/catholic culture that wants to kill gay people would lead to everyone covering up their HIV diagnosis?

[CLUTCH]

Originally posted by R for Reload:

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

My point is there is more research and development involved in heterosexual stds from the 1920s compared to homosexual research that was halted or avoided in the 1980s by the governement in which they proceeded to let them die.

That. Is. My. Point.

It doesn't make YOU any better.

STFD AND STFU!

okay but these are modern statistics not 1980s statistics.

if you cant comprehend between what i am saying and what you saying then i guess the problem is on your end.

if all types of stds where discovered at the same time frame and the same amount of effort then what?

you win? because more people died on the other side?

you feel better because more people died? makes you feel more important?

i don't understand your fascination with prep and thinking you are a better human being because you dont have to take it.

said time and time again already...hopefully this time it gets through to you.

hetero and homosexual sexual contact has both had death and diseases.

both have preventative measures.

I mean this is like 6th grade ♥♥♥♥.

you arent any better. wtf is wrong with you?

[CLUTCH]

Originally posted by Pinhead Larry:

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

My point is there is more research and development involved in heterosexual stds from the 1920s compared to homosexual research that was halted or avoided in the 1980s by the governement in which they proceeded to let them die.

That. Is. My. Point.

It doesn't make YOU any better.

STFD AND STFU!

Dumb inbred bigots will latch on to any misrepresented statistic that's convenient for their bigotry. Don't waste too much energy trying to convince that guy otherwise, the only person who can make someone else stop being stupid is themselves, if they actually gave a rip about homosexual people they'd have put in the effort to educate themselves and actually double check their own claims like you and I have.

Otherwise they'd know that HIV specifically has such a stigma that it goes majorly under reported in heterosexual people. Who knew that vilifying HIV as "the gay disease" in a predominantly christian/catholic culture that wants to kill gay people would lead to everyone covering up their HIV diagnosis?

I just find it interesting the lengths people will go to defend their bigotry whether it will be religion, gender, sexuality, or race.

[CLUTCH]

Originally posted by Pinhead Larry:

Originally posted by CLUTCH:

My point is there is more research and development involved in heterosexual stds from the 1920s compared to homosexual research that was halted or avoided in the 1980s by the governement in which they proceeded to let them die.

That. Is. My. Point.

It doesn't make YOU any better.

STFD AND STFU!

Dumb inbred bigots will latch on to any misrepresented statistic that's convenient for their bigotry. Don't waste too much energy trying to convince that guy otherwise, the only person who can make someone else stop being stupid is themselves, if they actually gave a rip about homosexual people they'd have put in the effort to educate themselves and actually double check their own claims like you and I have.

Otherwise they'd know that HIV specifically has such a stigma that it goes majorly under reported in heterosexual people. Who knew that vilifying HIV as "the gay disease" in a predominantly christian/catholic culture that wants to kill gay people would lead to everyone covering up their HIV diagnosis?

Yes just like how they figured out in the 70's and 80s through surveys 10% of the world population is gay.

Half or more of those people surveyed wouldn't admit their real sexuality anyways.

Nowadays the Trumpers like to drop it down to 1-2% to make themselves feel better for whatever reason.

[anova1147]

....Why is this still a conversation in 2025? looking forward to the day that hateful idiots finally get over themselves