inZOI
Regolith Mar 28 @ 9:38am
9
2
6
BOYCOTT GENERATIVE AI
I don't care if a game has identity politics in it. But I do care if a game or developer uses generative AI in their game or in promotional materials.
        
  • Generative AI has been trained on stolen copyrighted and uncopyrighted works, without permission, from millions of artists
        
  • The computers used to run large AI services use tons of electricity and require literal tons of water just for cooling.
        
  • Generative AI has been proven to make people who use it become less creative and effectively dumber.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 76 comments
pp Mar 28 @ 9:41am 
They use resources they created or only from artists they have permission from so it doesn't really matter. None of the material being used to generate anything has any sort of copyright issue.

The only problem I see is that tons of people upload copyright protected material on Canvas (textures) and there is no way to report it right now. I tried myself and the copyright report feature is currently bugged/broken.
Regolith Mar 28 @ 9:43am 
Originally posted by pp:
They use resources they created or only from artists they have permission from so it doesn't really matter. None of the material being used to generate anything has any sort of copyright issue.

The only problem I see is that tons of people upload copyright protected material on Canvas (textures) and there is no way to report it right now. I tried myself and the copyright report feature is currently bugged/broken.

But the AI the game uses was built on the works of non-consenting artists. On top of this, that's not the only issue. It's very clear that all of their promotional images are AI generated as well.
Originally posted by Regolith:
I don't care if a game has identity politics in it. But I do care if a game or developer uses generative AI in their game or in promotional materials.
        
  • Generative AI has been trained on stolen copyrighted and uncopyrighted works, without permission, from millions of artists
        
  • The computers used to run large AI services use tons of electricity and require literal tons of water just for cooling.
        
  • Generative AI has been proven to make people who use it become less creative and effectively dumber.
why dont you make art for them so they use that then?
DoctorOjama Mar 28 @ 9:45am 
Originally posted by Regolith:
I don't care if a game has identity politics in it. But I do care if a game or developer uses generative AI in their game or in promotional materials.
        
  • Generative AI has been trained on stolen copyrighted and uncopyrighted works, without permission, from millions of artists
        
  • The computers used to run large AI services use tons of electricity and require literal tons of water just for cooling.
        
  • Generative AI has been proven to make people who use it become less creative and effectively dumber.
the future is here art is dead grovel and woe weep and groan for your nightmare has taken form and no resistance can stop its strangling vines
pp Mar 28 @ 9:45am 
Originally posted by Regolith:
Originally posted by pp:
They use resources they created or only from artists they have permission from so it doesn't really matter. None of the material being used to generate anything has any sort of copyright issue.

The only problem I see is that tons of people upload copyright protected material on Canvas (textures) and there is no way to report it right now. I tried myself and the copyright report feature is currently bugged/broken.

But the AI the game uses was built on the works of non-consenting artists. On top of this, that's not the only issue. It's very clear that all of their promotional images are AI generated as well.
The only evidence we have is what they said, which is all material they used was from artists that gave permission or just ones they hired. They already stated that they are using their own material to generate AI stuff.
Chad of Nazareth Mar 28 @ 9:46am 
"Digital Artists: The True Menace to Art (A Satirical Manifesto)"

Oh, the horror! The digital revolution has unleashed a plague of so-called "artists" who dare to create without smearing charcoal on their hands or starving in a garret. Here’s how these tech-wielding hooligans are destroying the sanctity of real art:

"They CHEAT with UNDO buttons!"

Traditional artists spent years mastering the art of hiding mistakes under layers of paint. But digital upstarts? One click and poof—their shame vanishes. Where’s the suffering? Where’s the rage-quitting?

"They STEAL colors from RGB sliders!"

Real artists bled for their pigments (or at least paid $50 for a tube of cadmium red). These frauds just type in a hex code and call it a day. Zero mules were harmed in the making of their palette.

"They don’t even smell like turpentine!"

How can you trust an artist whose studio doesn’t reek of solvents and existential dread? Their "workspace" is just a laptop in a coffee shop. Disgraceful.

"They multiply art like gremlins!"

Traditional artists painstakingly create one original. Digital devils? They hit "Save As" and flood the world with infinite copies. The horror of democratized access!

"They outsource skill to machines!"

"Oh, just use a stabilizer for clean lines," they say. Back in my day, shaky hands built character (and abstract expressionism).

"They collaborate with algorithms!"

Real artists commune with tortured muses. Digital traitors? They ask Ctrl+Z for advice.

AI was used to make this post, as most certainly the original post was.
Regolith Mar 28 @ 9:46am 
Originally posted by cheebus weebus:
Originally posted by Regolith:
I don't care if a game has identity politics in it. But I do care if a game or developer uses generative AI in their game or in promotional materials.
        
  • Generative AI has been trained on stolen copyrighted and uncopyrighted works, without permission, from millions of artists
        
  • The computers used to run large AI services use tons of electricity and require literal tons of water just for cooling.
        
  • Generative AI has been proven to make people who use it become less creative and effectively dumber.
why dont you make art for them so they use that then?

I'm not a game artist, they haven't commissioned me for art, and I don't want to do business with people who resort to such lazy and destructive solutions in the first place.
󠀡󠀡 Mar 28 @ 9:48am 
2
2
The use of generative AI in a game means the developer can do more with less. It's a higher value product for less money. I'm all for it.
Regolith Mar 28 @ 9:49am 
Originally posted by 󠀡󠀡:
The use of generative AI in a game means the developer can do more with less. It's a higher value product for less money. I'm all for it.

actually braindead
cypris Mar 28 @ 9:50am 
Originally posted by Regolith:
I don't care if a game has identity politics in it. But I do care if a game or developer uses generative AI in their game or in promotional materials.
        
  • Generative AI has been trained on stolen copyrighted and uncopyrighted works, without permission, from millions of artists
        
  • The computers used to run large AI services use tons of electricity and require literal tons of water just for cooling.
        
  • Generative AI has been proven to make people who use it become less creative and effectively dumber.
you forgot to add that generative AI is incredible BASED and no one here cares if you lost your job to it
LunarSlayer Mar 28 @ 9:50am 
3
the game uses AI trash and the dipsticks are still crying over pronouns. gamers truly are the lowest form of life
XanapyXP Mar 28 @ 9:52am 
Originally posted by Regolith:
I don't care if a game has identity politics in it. But I do care if a game or developer uses generative AI in their game or in promotional materials.
        
  • Generative AI has been trained on stolen copyrighted and uncopyrighted works, without permission, from millions of artists
        
  • The computers used to run large AI services use tons of electricity and require literal tons of water just for cooling.
        
  • Generative AI has been proven to make people who use it become less creative and effectively dumber.
I’m not boycotting ♥♥♥♥
Team AI go ai i actually like the ai features in the game the people ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about it are just fan boys of EA who are mad because the game is doing better than the Sims or mad that they can’t buy the game because they can’t afford it
Originally posted by LunarSlayer:
the game uses AI trash and the dipsticks are still crying over pronouns. gamers truly are the lowest form of life
Oh but look who is in a gaming forum which would make you a gamer, which by your definition would make you the lowest form of life why would you insult yourself?
Last edited by Bigbrotherj1992; Mar 28 @ 10:00am
Originally posted by Bigbrotherj1992:
Originally posted by LunarSlayer:
the game uses AI trash and the dipsticks are still crying over pronouns. gamers truly are the lowest form of life
Oh but look who is in a gaming forum which would make you a gamer, which by your definition would make you the lowest form of life why would you insult yourself?
"oi why are you beating yourself!"
< >
Showing 1-15 of 76 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 28 @ 9:38am
Posts: 76