Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But this game is literally half the price of many releases? It's probably a nth of the price of TS4 with a bunch of addons. Not that I'm defending games costing £70/$100 at release but apparently that's the world we live in. Hell it's probably more or less the price of The Sims 3 or even The Sims 2 at release lol.
Maybe you're comparing it to an indie game price-point or something but I don't think I would call it that, even if it's true in spirit. Also I think the devs are doing exactly as you wish - we buy the game now and they add content through EA and after release. Rather than other games who charge less now then micro-transact players out the wazoo just to bring the game upto par. Which is fairer?
You can only RENT it until the activation servers go offline. Like Bioshock, Fable 3, Red Faction Guerrilla. Then you will be asked to rent it AGAIN for even more money until the new activation servers go offline. Or not even that option, as with Fable III.
Stop spreading misinformation. Blocked and reported.
Fair enough if you put it like that, but then what term would then prefer being applied. Since the same would technically go for any game on steam then as a whole?
I have a backlog of 500 games on steam + dozens on console & GOG. There is no reason to buy a game from some random DEV, who says that "we dont care about the consumers, they will get less than the pirates" or "our game is bad, people wont pay for it, they will pirate it".
The DEV lose money, what? Is this a clown-farming topic?
This game has more players on steam than the AAA Denuvo game Assassin's Creed Shadows. And this is day #1.
Denuvo makes it worth to pay for because you know that nobody can play for free, so it's fair for everyone. Krafton also wanted to do that, to make it fair for buyers yet people cried because they wanted to play for free. Many anti-denuvo enjoyers in this thread have not purchased the game, I'm still following some of them.
BTW: Performance dip is not only reason some don't like Denuvo its their anti consumer mentality too, like some their system can potentially bar you from playing game you paid money for. Like was case with new intel processor series where their boost processors triggered anti tampering responses within their protection and logged you from playing the game, which they at one point acknowledged and promised to fix for, but they never back logged fixed games for user who ran win 10 they were only going to fix the issue on win 11. So why would anyone want to deal with that anti consumer behavior, which causes your experience to be worse than for people who gained access to playing the game by illicit means for a better customer experience?
"My game is smooth" LOL this has to be bait, MHW was on mixed last time I checked exactly because of performance problems, even if yours is running smoothly theres was a lot of people who were having performance issues. Horrible example you picked there man.
Every game that has Denuvo has performance issues, and there's always some shill saying 'it's due to something else'
But the common denominator on the games with poor performance is, they all have Denuvo in them...funny that