Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't understand why the constitutional options take atheists into account in the first place. Choosing between Catholicism, protestantism, muhammedanism and buddhism feels more civilized to me.
Because atheism was a thing in the communist hell holes during those years. Interesting it got off the ground just about as well as me attempting to kick off all the theists from my island, but i'd prefer the game be less meta in that respect and actually let me try to make communism legit work. Because it really is the case that communism never got a fair shot due to everyone who implemented it being incompetent. There are tons of countries in europe which are highly socialist hybrids and it works marvelously because they aren't incompetent. So it isn't as black and white as they make it out to be in high school civics class that "socialism could never werk because corruption, lel".
Yes, and as we know every politician speaks truth without a politicial bias or agenda. When a country is suffering for some reason, they always blame the real culprit, they don't just take it as an opportunity to transmute the frustration and fear caused by the problem into fuel for their political preferences. That would just be unprofessional.
Communism was about government controlled infrastructure, jobs and a internally self sufficient economy that is entirely under the controll of the government. The Hybridised Socialist Captilist economies would weep if you described the edicts of communism in the same breath as thier developments.
This was slightly irrellevent so forgive me, but mentioning communism should work because of the european hybrid socialism kinda annoyed me. It implied a direct relationship in the structures. Dont use socialism to justify communism, use Chinas Hybrid Communism/Captialism for that.
I know that communism is slightly different, but my point was that the hatred and belief that communism is inherently flawed might just be as baseless as the hatred and belief in the non-workableness of socialism. We(that is, americans) have such a crappy view of socialism because once upon a time there were very very crappy governments that were very socialist. So our history books and our culture just passed on the notion, "Socialism doesn't work," without regard to other factors. And we got socialist-capitalist hybrids in the world that work really really well now. So it is plausible that a communism hybrid might be at least competitive, however it remains to be seen whether it gives better outcomes than either heavy socialism, light capitalism hybrids or light socialism, heavy capitalist hybrids.
No, because i'm not interested in getting into an argument over a quote that doesn't even make sense within the reality of modern socialist governments. If you think that quote makes sense, you don't understand how socialism actually works.