Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
Source: The Income Tax here in Great Britain dropped by a full 5% this year, sadly so did my wages...
The same reason that I got a large pay rise when the Income Tax increased by 10%.
Which is what?
And how on earth does raising taxes on people make companies pay higher wages?
And this higlights how the complexity of Democracy 3 is but a mere speck of dust compared to the complete cluster-f***k of the real world :D
I too think there are some connections between other taxes, like income tax, and the GDP that are missing from the game, but this probably has to do with game design goals and playability. I believe that the developer has stated that he didn't want the game to be "too stacked against" any particular political philosophy so people could conceivably "win" using totally opposite strategies, but this is obviously more of a game decision to make things more entertaining for more people than it is an attempt at realism.
Kind of like how you can't make all the simulated voters in the game happy, the developer can't make all the non-simulated real players happy either.