Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
On the other hand, I do not think Rune warriors had the time to create their own culture. They were slaves during the reign of the Circle mages, and for the 8+ years after the Convocation, they were usually and likely under someone else's control for the most part. The heroes of Spellforce 1 were freed by being given their own runes (and in Spellforce 2, some rune warriors found them, after rune magic was broken). And of course, the rune magic started to fade after the fall of Hokan Ashir.
I'd guess the rune warriors were similar to the Shaikan - I'd suppose rune warriors would also become a warrior based culture if their runes worked longer.
So I'd guess I like them both, for different reasons, some you've already mentoned. :)
I like the Rune warriors because they've been in so many wars as pawns, and they have hated the war ever since. Although, at the same time, it was something they were best at.
Shaikan became mostly mercenaries, I'd guess, and when they got their own land, a warrior culture.
Rune Warriors remind me of the terminator for some reason. They get summoned.... destroy everything.... go back to sleep...
Well true but there was no real explanation. I am not disliking it that much.