(Review Update) 79% negative reviews last 7 days

[ArcheNovalis]

https://i.imgur.com/A402DHV.png

Over the last 7 days, 79% of reviews left by players with less than 3 hours were negative.

[LowIQ]

Yeah that's cus they're the kind of people who die in a game one time, throw the game down, say it's bad and it's all the game's fault, and the people are hackers.

These guys would be DSP, but they don't have the commitment to stick it out that he does. And that says a lot.

[Grimmsch]

Personally I don't take people with 0.8 hours played seriously for reviews.
Still read through some of the new player feedback.
Most seem to be technical issues. Ragequits.
Then there is clunky combat (fair), no OCE (fair), not enough tutorial, I don't like PvP (go away), matchmaking.

Here are some examples:

"Hits Skeleton 11 times while dodging hits.
Gets hit once and dies. "

"Needs an option to not lose all items when you die"

One sad guy got cornered by two deers and had nowhere to go.

And nutcases like :
"They've literally stolen multiple assets, mechanics, and coding from DaD and copy-pasted it into a mobile game engine"

Yeah buddy. That is not how that works.

Player with more time played seem to criticize mostly Clotho's trial (word), balance, gear disparity, cheating and timegated legendary drops (understandable).

Without the playtime filter there are 59% negative reviews in the last 7 days (303 positive, 423 negative).

Still not looking good.
Sales went up - don't tell me people bought the pixel skins ^^

[ArcheNovalis]

Games die when new players are turned away; attrition.

[The Fallen One]

Originally posted by ArcheNovalis:

Games die when new players are turned away; attrition.

amen. it's seriously discouraging to be a new player trying to get into a game and getting shouted down by players who've been playing the game for awhile all because you're just trying to ask about the game. there's always some toxic doorknob whose gotta crap all over someone to make himself feel like a man cause hoping people would be decent to each other i guess is just a bit too much to hope for.

[TripSin]

Originally posted by LowIQ:

Yeah that's cus they're the kind of people who die in a game one time, throw the game down, say it's bad and it's all the game's fault, and the people are hackers.

These guys would be DSP, but they don't have the commitment to stick it out that he does. And that says a lot.

Expecting people to keep playing a game that they aren't enjoying or having a good experience with is nonsensical. The simple fact of the matter is that a video game has to provide an enjoyable experience in order to attract and retain players. If you provide a frustrating, unfun experience then people aren't going to keep playing your game.

[PlayGames2020]

Originally posted by TripSin:

Originally posted by LowIQ:

Yeah that's cus they're the kind of people who die in a game one time, throw the game down, say it's bad and it's all the game's fault, and the people are hackers.

These guys would be DSP, but they don't have the commitment to stick it out that he does. And that says a lot.

Expecting people to keep playing a game that they aren't enjoying or having a good experience with is nonsensical. The simple fact of the matter is that a video game has to provide an enjoyable experience in order to attract and retain players. If you provide a frustrating, unfun experience then people aren't going to keep playing your game.

not even this, just fix the GS matchmaking , no legs, no purples in lobbys with levels under 20 simple as that only green/blue

[TripSin]

Originally posted by PlayGames2020:

Originally posted by TripSin:

Expecting people to keep playing a game that they aren't enjoying or having a good experience with is nonsensical. The simple fact of the matter is that a video game has to provide an enjoyable experience in order to attract and retain players. If you provide a frustrating, unfun experience then people aren't going to keep playing your game.

not even this, just fix the GS matchmaking , no legs, no purples in lobbys with levels under 20 simple as that only green/blue

You get that in casual castle currently, though? With the recent patch you now have the bracket being 0-20 with 9 players (up from gray players being capped at 6 player matches). Increasing the max player count from 6 to 9 is one of the few changes they've done that I've actually really liked. It is possible to bring in a purple (heirloom only?), but only under specific conditions.

You can't play in classic mode with GBMM, though.

[Rikuto01]

Originally posted by LowIQ:

These guys would be DSP, but they don't have the commitment to stick it out that he does. And that says a lot.

Damn. You really pulled the DSP card.

[ArcheNovalis]

Originally posted by Rikuto01:

Originally posted by LowIQ:

These guys would be DSP, but they don't have the commitment to stick it out that he does. And that says a lot.

Damn. You really pulled the DSP card.

he's too @LowIQ to use it properly tho

[Seweryn Najemny]

Originally posted by LowIQ:

Yeah that's cus they're the kind of people who die in a game one time, throw the game down, say it's bad and it's all the game's fault, and the people are hackers.

Those people are absolutely right.

This isn't Tarkov where a good shot will net you a kill so long as the bullet loaded in your gun is of a good enough caliber and PvP is concentrated to a few small locations on otherwise vast maps.

You get 2 maps with crappy layouts, classes that are in no way balanced for either team or 1v1 fights, basically braindead auto-pilot PvE that is a slog to get through and of no use as a 3rd party if you get jumped on, and several classes that are explicitly designed to benefit from the style of play that is the least fun to face possible.

The game has some merit in a team, where you can side-step some of the issues with the combined DPS and added safety in numbers, but if you want to just casually solo-que or only just started out, there is literally nothing to keep you playing.

The only thing Dungeonborne has going for it is that it's relatively generous, but even that wears thin after a while, because there isn't much of a goal to it.

[St3rbehilf3]

propably i unalived some of the negative reviewers in an eye of a blink... they throw game away and wrote negative comment haha

[Erdrick]

I've got 430+ hours and left a negative review after last patch :)