Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n5E7feJHw0
Not to mention reduced fuel consumption even at full speed, increased fuel capacity and top speed at 55 mph.
Order now: 1-800-SUPERSHERMY!
yes, sure, they preferred fighting in the East against T34/85, IS1 and IS 2. These were kindergartentanks in comparison to the galactic Sherman...
Well, I prefer riding in a Panther, even in a PzIV G or H or a Hetzer than in ANY M4. There is no "best tank", there is always a good or best tank for a certain role. The M4 was mainly an infantry tank, for this it was good, but not "best".
What pounds? British? Man, you seriously need to get at least one leg back into reality!
blame the original sherman designer who created it so weak.
Especially considering that it's rather old copypasta and there are still so many people falling for it.