Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
With that said, I can imagine some inspiration has been drawn from Shadow Watch.
In my humble opinion, this it not necessarily a bad thing.
Turn based game are a rarity these days.
Good turn based games are very rare indeed.
If this game will be able to provide similar levels of entertainment and comparable atmosphere as Shadow Watch did, I just might fall in love with it.
Links to information on Shadow watch, so everyone can clearly see what the subject of discussion is:
Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_Watch
Playthrough (youtube, and not me playing)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHHPsLmfOa4
I had to resort to this "strong" language in order to draw more people to the topic actually, to be honest I just wanted people to try find out what Shadow Watch is as it was perhaps the first animated top-dow, turn-based sneaker (in my memory).
And also so that people won't go comparing future titles in the genre to this game, as it is unfair to the progenitor - Shadow Watch. It makes me feel exactly the same feeling I had when everyone was comparing new FPSs to Halo when obviously there was Quake 1 and 2, or when a semi-realistic shooter with elements of tactics is released and people compare it to CS while obviously R6 was and is the ultimate tactical shooter.
I understand why companies are doing it, if you bring something up from the past that actually has more features than your title you will definately fail, so you compare it to a more famous but shallow competitor. I hope that's not the case here, but don't forget who stood at the beginnings of a genre so you actually have something to compare it to, and not be like an arrogant IGN reviewer that has an embarassingly miniature knowledge of gaming industry seeing every new game as "an original concept".
Didn't like the "old vs. new" direction of the debate though. Can't good old games hang around with fresh new stuff like pals?
I see people already making reviews like "it's a mix of X-Com and Gunpoint".
Do you know, where to buy it? THX
IE It has similar mechanics but is very different in a variety of ways.
And only ill-informed plebs would label this game as a clone.