Guru3D review is out:

[styckx]

Not looking good

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/watch_dogs_vga_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,1.html

So after testing six cards we immediately halted testing. The game was a mess, the results all over the place with many anomalies and offsets, Ultra Quality settings at Ultra HD would even use up to 6+ GB on the graphics memory. Ultra HD became a stutter-fest especially in-game at road at crossings and with cars passing by.

Concluding then, as much as we like games to stress graphics cards we are a little puzzled. Watch Dogs is not a game that looks mouth-watering good, I mean it is nice and all, but it is just that. To see graphics card struggle this much over graphics memory is weird to see. However if you use our guidelines then your frame-rate should remain very acceptable and the game playable whilst looking good. You will still run into the occasional stutters here and there as it is the nature of the game engine I'm afraid.

[Artillery Horse]

Another game released without any respect for it's audience. Shove it out there and see where the crap falls. I will wait until it's on sale for $20

[Zen]

not surprised.

[rizzee]

evrything ive been saying for the last 3 days this game is garbage

[Tanuki]

Running smooth on my friend's GT 745m on medium-high.

The review comletely neglects the CPU and RAM used. And isnt even a review of the game. Just of 2 cards reviewed without the drivers that were released this morning.


Take your ♥♥♥♥ review elsewhere.

[Trapgat]

780 TI, I'll run it in High Quality/ High Tx / FXAA / FullHD with 74 FPS

Hope they fix it soon...

[Lt. Speirs]

That's not a really good review, especially when there are fixes readily available and no PC patches have been implimented yet.

[StAASN]

The Vegan Zombie =AJSA= eredeti hozzászólása:

Running smooth on my friend's GT 745m on medium-high.

The review comletely neglects the CPU and RAM used. And isnt even a review of the game. Just of 2 cards reviewed without the drivers that were released this morning.


Take your ♥♥♥♥ review elsewhere.

Why do you feel obliged to defend a video game? It is undoubtedly unoptimised, you have more laptop users saying they can run it easily (lucky for me I guess haha) than desktop users do.

So while I doubt I'll have problems on my 670m, people with 780 DESKTOP CARDS shouldn't have issues either, but for some reason it isn't true. It's unoptimised and that is that, no need to defend any game ever either, people are allowed to have their own opinions on the game, but people like you tell them to piss off just because yours is different to theirs.

[Ace-Educator]

I hope with all this bad ♥♥♥♥ about PC games Ubisoft will actually sit down and do actual work.

It's either that or they will stop releasing for PC.

[Eeffy]

I would ♥♥♥♥ on Guru3d, they are in my opinion such a bad review page. Wait until tomorrow and you will see how WD will run and how it will look like...

[Tanuki]

StASN54 eredeti hozzászólása:

The Vegan Zombie =AJSA= eredeti hozzászólása:

Running smooth on my friend's GT 745m on medium-high.

The review comletely neglects the CPU and RAM used. And isnt even a review of the game. Just of 2 cards reviewed without the drivers that were released this morning.


Take your ♥♥♥♥ review elsewhere.

Why do you feel obliged to defend a video game? It is undoubtedly unoptimised, you have more laptop users saying they can run it easily (lucky for me I guess haha) than desktop users do.

So while I doubt I'll have problems on my 670m, people with 780 DESKTOP CARDS shouldn't have issues either, but for some reason it isn't true. It's unoptimised and that is that, no need to defend any game ever either, people are allowed to have their own opinions on the game, but people like you tell them to piss off just because yours is different to theirs.

I'm defending the game because the "review" is biased and not taking account of the variables they should be using.

That'd be like reviewing a trip to Hawaii from pictures you found on the internet that are grainy 100x100 images from Google Search.
Stop trying to hurt the game's image in an obvious troll-bait post that is half-assed at that.

[Eeffy]

The Vegan Zombie =AJSA= eredeti hozzászólása:

StASN54 eredeti hozzászólása:

Why do you feel obliged to defend a video game? It is undoubtedly unoptimised, you have more laptop users saying they can run it easily (lucky for me I guess haha) than desktop users do.

So while I doubt I'll have problems on my 670m, people with 780 DESKTOP CARDS shouldn't have issues either, but for some reason it isn't true. It's unoptimised and that is that, no need to defend any game ever either, people are allowed to have their own opinions on the game, but people like you tell them to piss off just because yours is different to theirs.

I'm defending the game because the "review" is biased and not taking account of the variables they should be using.

That'd be like reviewing a trip to Hawaii from pictures you found on the internet that are grainy 100x100 images from Google Search.
Stop trying to hurt the game's image in an obvious troll-bait post that is half-assed at that.

Give that dude a cookie!

[styckx]

Guxany eredeti hozzászólása:

I would ♥♥♥♥ on Guru3d, they are in my opinion such a bad review page. Wait until tomorrow and you will see how WD will run and how it will look like...

Many people already know how it runs. It runs like AC4 and GTA IV had a baby and BF4 was the real father.

[StAASN]

The Vegan Zombie =AJSA= eredeti hozzászólása:

StASN54 eredeti hozzászólása:

Why do you feel obliged to defend a video game? It is undoubtedly unoptimised, you have more laptop users saying they can run it easily (lucky for me I guess haha) than desktop users do.

So while I doubt I'll have problems on my 670m, people with 780 DESKTOP CARDS shouldn't have issues either, but for some reason it isn't true. It's unoptimised and that is that, no need to defend any game ever either, people are allowed to have their own opinions on the game, but people like you tell them to piss off just because yours is different to theirs.

I'm defending the game because the "review" is biased and not taking account of the variables they should be using.

That'd be like reviewing a trip to Hawaii from pictures you found on the internet that are grainy 100x100 images from Google Search.
Stop trying to hurt the game's image in an obvious troll-bait post that is half-assed at that.

Is your last sentence aimed at me or the OP, because not once did I say that I agreed with the post or the review, sorry for misunderstanding.

[IM LOVING THESE RPG'S JERRY!]

yo i told u all yo

[rinaldop]

Why not post this quote from the article?

"The game itself is sheer fun"