Watch Dogs on ultra settings looks as good as xbox 360 version.. a tad better.. LMFAO

[InvisibleShadow]

http://www.gameranx.com/updates/id/22116/article/watch-dogs-ultra-pc-settings-gameplay-videos/

Guess Ubisoft lied to everyone ... once again.. LOL.. woe be to those who pre purchased this gift wrapped turd. Except Ive grown up to see through their garbage hype trains.. Ghost Recon Future Soldier. Ass Creed 3.. Ass creed IV.. ( good game but terrible performance ).. didnt any body see the signs.. a game thats got 7-8 versions being released for almost every platform.. shock they didnt announce a 3DS version of this ... how many micromanaged team of nitwits do u think were working on each port.. and which one do u think got the most dedication.. most likely the ps4 version .. LOL.. Ive seen WD on steam top sellers for weeks now.. and this is what ur money has bot u... i Will TORRENT THE CRAP out of this.. and then .. IF the game itself is worth a replay buy it when its on sale a year or mayb 3 .. after.. Promised myself i wont get conned by ubisoft again. i keep my promises to myself.. i feel sorry for the sods who bot this unoptimized crap.. The video footage from that link has the game looking like a glorified GTA IV with godrays .. lots of fadein/popin.. builds and enviroment looks generic as hell..

FACE IT UBISOFT DID A FANTASTIC JOB OF MARKETING THE HIT SET PIECE MOMENTS OF THE GAME AND PPL ATE IT UP LIKE IT WAS CHOCLATE GOO.. THEY WON>.

[Dallas]

lol not true.... i don't know where you get your information from they\'ve already said that high settings is the equivalent to PS4 so unless the xbox get magically OP i don't think you made an intelegent inference

[InvisibleShadow]

its what the articles says man.. i just quoted it.. personally i havent seen what the 360 version looks like.. but its certain from the vids its not as good as the pc.. but thats besides the point. this guy is running on a decent rig.. and if hes says theres frame stutters.. and and i can already see the popin with my own eyes.. and given ubisofts history with AC and bugs.. i have no faith for this game.. the video really doesnt prove otherwise.. quite frankly ill be happy if im right.. because then i ill know im rite. i dont care for the ppl who bot this. XD

[C-LOS N Y C]

yes, i agree to a certain degree. its another unoptmized PORT from Ubisoft. there is nothing next gen about watch dogs, its a game held back by last gen. th E3 demo was next gen, this isnt. i fell for the hype and for the lie. never did for far cry 3 o aciv since those games never interested me. i was hoping for WD to be different. the game needs a day 1 patch immediately.

[LordEddi]

C-LOSNYC lähetti viestin:

yes, i agree to a certain degree. its another unoptmized PORT from Ubisoft. there is nothing next gen about watch dogs, its a game held back by last gen. th E3 demo was next gen, this isnt. i fell for the hype and for the lie. never did for far cry 3 o aciv since those games never interested me. i was hoping for WD to be different. the game needs a day 1 patch immediately.

First of all, I have tried the "leaked" version, and anyone claiming that the PC graphics and xbox 360 are comparable, need to have their head checked.

Secondly, 1 day patch before release? Chill the hell out.

[Dallas]

C-LOSNYC lähetti viestin:

yes, i agree to a certain degree. its another unoptmized PORT from Ubisoft. there is nothing next gen about watch dogs, its a game held back by last gen. th E3 demo was next gen, this isnt. i fell for the hype and for the lie. never did for far cry 3 o aciv since those games never interested me. i was hoping for WD to be different. the game needs a day 1 patch immediately.

that's the glory of the game not even being out Kappa

[C-LOS N Y C]

LordEddi lähetti viestin:

C-LOSNYC lähetti viestin:

yes, i agree to a certain degree. its another unoptmized PORT from Ubisoft. there is nothing next gen about watch dogs, its a game held back by last gen. th E3 demo was next gen, this isnt. i fell for the hype and for the lie. never did for far cry 3 o aciv since those games never interested me. i was hoping for WD to be different. the game needs a day 1 patch immediately.

First of all, I have tried the "leaked" version, and anyone claiming that the PC graphics and xbox 360 are comparable, need to have their head checked.

Secondly, 1 day patch before release? Chill the hell out.

lol, its a day 1 patch, that means for release date not for the leaked version kid, come on, lets get serious here, learn to read between the lines. and never did i say that it looks like the 360 version, thats the op. what i am saying its that its an unptimized piece of ♥♥♥♥ that needs serious attention if they even want their pc audience to take them seriously, or anyone, since all they have been lately is lying.

[Horny Shrimp]

It does not. I don't know if the "deffered lighting" option will be turned on by default ( "PC" instead of "console" ) but it does make a huge difference when turned on. It is quite close to the 2012 demo ( except for the changes that were made since though, like less lens flares and worse explosions ).

Did Ubisoft lie regarding the quality of the game/graphics? Well, I still have to find a Ubi game that hasn't been overhyped to death. But I think the difference is much smaller than the Aliens debacle. Now, if you're talking about optimization... this title is like most pc games/ports: optimized like ♥♥♥♥...

[BoB (Best of Boxes)]

♥♥♥♥ son, if those videos are what Xbox 360 look like, remind me to brush the damn thing off.

"the ultra settings PC version looks a tad better than the game on Xbox 360"

"PC high settings were equivalent to the graphics found in the PS4 and Xbox One versions."

Therefore, stop baiting.

P.S. This article is pretty poorly written and almost misleads itself really, I'd go elsewhere next time.

[InvisibleShadow]

BoB (Best of Boxes)³ lähetti viestin:

♥♥♥♥ son, if those videos are what Xbox 360 look like, remind me to brush the damn thing off.

"the ultra settings PC version looks a tad better than the game on Xbox 360"

"PC high settings were equivalent to the graphics found in the PS4 and Xbox One versions."

Therefore, stop baiting.

P.S. This article is pretty poorly written and almost misleads itself really, I'd go elsewhere next time.

Its only misleading to people who are easily misled.. Granted the title and content are bombastic and out of proportion but we get away from saying such or worse when conversing with friends in real life.. as long as the point gets across .. specificity is for nazis and defenders.. objectively the proofs in the pudding.. the video suggests the performance is not what ubisoft promises.. forgetting that they are a bunch of propagandistic lying ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.. the performance wont be nearly on par on ppl with mid range rigs.. i myself have already set my standards for the version ill rip.. cap the game at 40 fps and crank the settings to max and if i luck out FPS will remain stable locked there.. IF im lucky. unfortunately games like AC 3 and IV beg to differ regarding that strategy. as i recall i had to lock fps for those games.. ( again settings cranked to highest) to 32 fps to get stability locked in. I dont care for 60 fps if it goes up and down and stutters..

From what ive seen.. theres a good chance the story and game mechanics itself have a sturdy chance of being good nuff to make this a fun game. but for pc .. the performance will become a deciding factor for how much fun u can have.. for many ppl like myself..

And for those who are riding their hopes on day 1 patches.. remember sometimes it can make the game even worse.. and never have i seen a day 1 patch for a ubisoft game thats fixed any performance issues.. maybe some game breaking bug.. but rarely performance.

[INFYN]

how about you play the game before making yourself look like an idiot

bit late for the latter part though

[BoB (Best of Boxes)]

VaeVictis lähetti viestin:

BoB (Best of Boxes)³ lähetti viestin:

*snip*

*snip*

Sorry to say friend, but if you want to complain about graphics then say your rig won't be able to handle them anyway, you shouldnt complain about the graphics. I noticed no optimization problems with Black Flag, the game ran great, zero hiccups all the way. Why? Because I put a paycheck or two into just my computer by now. Sadly, if you want to experience high end graphics, you have to shell out high end prices. It's the way things work.

[InvisibleShadow]

INFYN lähetti viestin:

how about you play the game before making yourself look like an idiot

bit late for the latter part though

Played GTA? played AC? .. Played True crime? Played Sleeping dogs? Played Red Dead redemption? played just cause? Played Saints Row? Theres nothing here that breaks away from what anybody has derived from experiencing any one of these other titles ive just mentioned save for dissimilarity of performance.. going from one system to another.. one platform to another.. thats to be expected but it also dictates much of the kind of experience that is derived from the game itself..

can u make an assessment of how a game might feel or run from recalling any of these past titles and watching one of the videos linked? or do u need to switch to a higher functioning brain for that kid?

[InvisibleShadow]

BoB (Best of Boxes)³ lähetti viestin:

VaeVictis lähetti viestin:

*snip*

Sorry to say friend, but if you want to complain about graphics then say your rig won't be able to handle them anyway, you shouldnt complain about the graphics. I noticed no optimization problems with Black Flag, the game ran great, zero hiccups all the way. Why? Because I put a paycheck or two into just my computer by now. Sadly, if you want to experience high end graphics, you have to shell out high end prices. It's the way things work.

i run a 3770k @ 4.3ghz .. 16gbs of Corsair Vengeance ddr3.. on asus p8z77-v Deluxe mobo.. with 2x evga gtx 680 SCs SLI.. its not the greatest rig considering 780 ti is out. and gtx titan blacks are out there in systems.. Sli'd... but this rig destroys "next gen" consoles.. id like to see that in practical terms ... not in e3 game demos.. not in engine demos and cutscenes..

Black Flag ran great? LOL.. think sli'd titans wered needed to run that in 60 fps.. Black Flag wasnt as AC 3. but it ran poorly.. i dunno if u know but the game .. just like ac 3. doesnt make use of multi core cpus.. i dont want to get into the technical jargon.. but u clearly dont know ♥♥♥♥ bout this stuff .. or ur runnin 4 way sli titans..

[Turbo]

To the OP:
You need to stop and think before you post crap like this. Unless you are just trolling.
Any video you watch is compressed by youtube so you can't compare youtube videos so don't bother trying.
As for the article and the authors comment you need to quote everything he said and read it with SARCASM. If you are still too dumb to figure it out the key word here is NEEDLESS.
Now I understand not everyone reads english as a first langauge and that might make it diffcult but the author even put a link build into the quote that takes you to another article that says how horrible the 360 version is(goes on to compare it to a PS2):
"*Needless* to say, the ultra settings PC version looks a *tad*[sarcasm!]) better than the game on Xbox 360"
It's not misleading unless you are an idiot. Current PC hardware is so far beyond the 10 year old 360 that only an idiot would believe such nonsense.

[BoB (Best of Boxes)]

VaeVictis lähetti viestin:

BoB (Best of Boxes)³ lähetti viestin:

*snip*

*snip*

Again, I saw no issues, despite all the complaints. It ran perfectly, well above sixty frames, and I had everything turned up. Whatever people say they need for it, I found no problems with what I had.

Just to also say this, because it is something we do have to eventually let be said: Isn't the point of a video game to have fun with the game? FTL wasn't critically acclaimed for it's graphics by any stretch of the margin. I saw very little hype coming out of the developers about graphics on this game, only the gameplay. That could say that they may have knew about this, okay, oh well, EA does this too, and they're one of the giant powerhouse in the market right now. The gameplay is what people should stay around for, graphics are just the thing to make people be pulled in really. A game shouldnt sell to you purely on graphics.

The article you use for your arguement contradicts itself with "Needless to say a tad better", which means it was obviously much better(using a hint of sarcasm almost to say it wasn't a contest), or not at all. However, this is before saying the high setting is the PS4 and Xbox One version of the game.