Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Half of this game is a sequel and half (the part with Sadja) is a completely new story, new characters etc., but there are a lot of references to the previous Chains of Satinav game and even other Daedalic games, like The Night of the Rabbit. You'll get more from this game and well, Chains of Satinav is a game worth knowing, even despite the animations. ;)
I absolutely intend to play Chains of Satinav eventually as every Daedalic game I've played so far has blown me away, but in all honestly Memoria interests me more right now
Hopefully playing them in that order wouldn't totally ruin the experience?
Thanks in advance!
Thanks for the advice, too bad, i did not intended to spend 38 euros at first °_O
Memoria has some spoilers though. You know what happens with Nuri, and Geron talks a lot about the previous events when he's with her at the Waterfall. I think they wanted to give some of the background to new players. If you play Memoria first, the story in Chains of Satinav won't be that new to you.