Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Depends what resolution and graphics settings you play on period. On 1080p and default/medium graphics settings, I doubt. Yet I would no longer find it a surprise games requiring more than 16GB of memory, 32 GB is becoming a standard. Heck I upgraded to 64 GB, thought it was insane , not until I checked performance metrics on some games I play and realized its at borderline 32 GB, so technically no need for 64 GB yet we know how memory upgrade works. THis is ,because I am playing at 5120x1440 demanding games on max.
It will run it on standard 1080p and perhaps low settings. Being able to run does not mean top notch performance.
mass war is more CPU and/or GPU intensive than memory. Its either you run out or you don't , memory can only make 1-5 FPS difference realistically depending on the clock speed.
It's right on the store page
No s h i t, it does not make the question invalid. Many things are stated ,but we do otherwise. Back in the day I played so many games below minimum requirement and I was able to play. So ,i f I strictly followed the brochure, I should have just crashed and not been able to launch- that is what your message ultimately tries to convey.