Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I do agree that the Origins version of the game is very easy to keep picking up new runs and just keep playing; it's quick to start a new run and there's no "barrier to entry" because you just hit the start button. I imagine that the full game with character selection and possibly meta-progression will be a slightly different story; it'll have a lot more replayability but ironically that doesn't always lead to more engagement -- humans typically like simple challenges with a quick turnaround on the reward; making the challenge more complex will make it more rewarding for those who maintain engagement, but not everyone actually wants that from a game. The simpler and faster it is to start a new game, the more it'll dig its hooks in; more buttons and choices = more effort to start that run = less immediate reward loop (it feels like more "wasted effort" if you go through all that and the run ends suddenly; whereas if it's a single button to get started then you don't really care if the run dies immediately.)
You are theoretically not wrong, but in this context you make it sound like the game having a main menu/character select will drive engagement down from excessive complexity, which is nonsense.