Dancing "Dragon" is not a Dragon

[Jayscee]

I know that technically he is not born from the egg, but WHY. If it looks like a dragon, quacks like a dragon and literally has "Dragon" in its name - it should be a Dragon.

[playwithfurcifer]

Let me explain the why:
It does not quack like a dragon tho, its made from paper and you punch people with it.
It has a stick at the bottom.

Similarly a portrait like the mona lisa does not qualify for human rights. :p

[Jayscee]

Originally posted by playwithfurcifer:

Let me explain the why:
It does not quack like a dragon tho, its made from paper and you punch people with it.
It has a stick at the bottom.

Similarly a portrait like the mona lisa does not qualify for human rights. :p

People have pet rocks Irl, i fail to see how I can't pet and care for a good paper dragon boy

[playwithfurcifer]

I assumed it was about it being a dragon, not about being a pet.
I don't think we should make it a pet ether, with the same argument rocks are not a pet currently. (Even though ranger would love that) :D

[Jayscee]

Well yeah, there is just no real world example to provide for a "dragon" argument since, well... there seems to be an apparent lack of dragons in the life of a modern civilian.
It is more than reasonable that it is not a pet since it is inanimate, but it not being a dragon too is a bit iffy.

On that note, why do "dragons" not have a keyword at the bottom while the game obviously recognizes it as a saparate keyword to just "pet"?

[Bumc]

Originally posted by playwithfurcifer:

I assumed it was about it being a dragon, not about being a pet.
I don't think we should make it a pet ether, with the same argument rocks are not a pet currently. (Even though ranger would love that) :D

Well that's an idea for the next unique, artifact stone: nature.
Pet rock, applies poison itself and when adjacent weapons attack.