Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Even so, no your laptop (which is not an average laptop, it's very low-end) will not be able to play The Forest. The minimum requirements is a CPU @2.4GHz. Yours do have turbo @2.6GHz, which would mean you'll fry it pretty soon if the game would even launch.
Your specs is really odd, because the GPU and RAM are not bad at all, actually those are on the mid-high level when it comes to laptops, but the CPU makes the machine useless for anything but viewing your desktop. Your empty, sad, desktop. You know how you have to wait forever for a program or a webpage to load? Yeah, that's your CPU. Sorry.
Wow a computer programming expert is among us.
Lol, thanks for the honest answer but optimization IS a real thing :D How am I able to play games like Shadow of Mordor and FarCry 4, on 60 fps, even witcher 3 with a rare fps drops (still playable tho) but for example my sweet little H1z1 is lagging like hell and some other stuff too. So, my point is if you deny that optimization plays a big role in the performance then you`ve got yourself a goddly PC and you have never experianced the struggle
Only way I can figure is you're running them on absolute minimum graphics options with many turned off, and a far reduced resolution (the lowest I'll tolerate is 1600x900).
People use 'optimization' poorly, it does play a role in performance, but when gamers use it they use it simply to say "my inadequate rig can't handle the game, it needs optimization". Optimization can't make your machine better, it can give you shorter loadtimes and at best slightly better FPS, but if you can't run the game to begin with no optimization will fix that.
Sidenote: I do have a godly PC, because I know my stuff #PCMasterRace #WowImSoHumble
There's always two ways to counter system demands. One, the better but costly one, is to buy or better yet, build, a really good pc. That way you can ignore the demands because your superior hardware laughs at the shoddy programming. (Most of the time, some games, like Assassins Creed Unity, and many unity games in general, can still cause issues, but that's because unity isn't very well optimized and often has RAM issues even on 16 GB systems.)
The other is lowering your graphics. Resolution is the biggest factor that can increase your FPS by far and wide.
For the Forest, I can't say with certainty if it would work for you. That's because The Forest can have a lot of models on screen (GPU RAM demand) can require lots of RAM for all the items and processes, like the destroyable environment, felled trees into logs, etc. similar to Minecraft, and your CPU is kind of really, really low.
What you *can* do however is to buy The Forest, test it on your system for *less than two hours* (can always refund that), and if it doesn't work, refund (or get a better system) and you're fine.
Trying is the only way to know with a system like yours. It might work, with lower resolution, medium to low graphics, but it might not. Test it.
To literally go so far as to say "It's not really a thing" in favour of 'If you can't run it, your pc must be trash', like wow.
Optimisation is as blatantly "a thing" as the graphics themselves. It's also really quite hard to use the word incorrectly because technically, regardless of the game and regardless of the system, if the game WAS more optimised, it WOULD run better on that computer, that's the simple black and white of it.
Of course there are optimisation standards and unrealistic (but possible) expectations-
Getting a game to run only decently (Like Subnautica) is acceptable and easier than getting a game to run excellently (Like Doom 2016 / Eternal), or heck, even Roller Coaster Tycoon.. Whilst you can't expect The Forest to be as well optimised as Doom, the simple fact is that it could be and if it were, it would probably run on a lot more low-end computers.
So yes, optimisation is absolutely an ever-improvable thing that effects every game,
and The Forest certainly could use a bit more polish because it IS fairly un-optimised.