Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
However, I do not recommend this order if you haven't played them before. The writing assumes you played in release order (OOAM first) and does not go back and explain things it expects you to know already.
So, for example, we once had a very confused player in here who hadn't played OOAM, did not know the meaning or significance of the word "rakash," and spent all of MOS thinking "rakash" was the character's actual name. And that's not the only point that chronological-order folks have struggled with over the years.
If you've played them before then it's of course fine to do whatever, but I just really don't rec chronological for your first playthrough.