安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I'd expect a WTF first impression from TB to go up within a week of release, as he can usually get a WTF video up fairly quickly when he push's for it. I'd also advise keeping an eye on his twitch - he might do a research stream for it. AngryJoe will like be the week after release, or slightly later - his reviews generally always take quite a bit of time to produce.
I'll wait till the $60 suckers test it for me then if it's good I'll buy it on Steam October 15th when it's $30.
Didn't they say Watchdogs was good, lotsa hype? Anyone remember that game? I don't......
What do you want them to say about performance? Do they have to explicitly state that there is nothing wrong with the performance on the pc to make you happy?
It's a PC review. What they were running it on, what settings and how it performed would be nice to know. Maybe tell us about some of the possible graphics settings. So yes, I would like more technical information, not the dribble that's in that review.
Ign is corrupt as hell and we will see the real value of the game when its out.
Not saying it wont be good. Looking forward to it like hell. But Ign is corrupted