Forthog Orc-Slayer DLC will be included in game in memory of the late Mr Michael David Forgey.

[ZX]

I want to know this community's thoughts on the Forthog DLC pack.

What are all your thoughts on this?

[Druid]

its a dlc pack?

[Druid]

didnt know that lol

[Rayu]

WARNING!!! large wall of text. but i was just ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ pissed when i read about this so bear with me as i rant about this.
the fact that they are getting profit from someone dying is the worst case of day 1 dlc or even any kind of dlc i have ever seen, it is simply horrible from WB to do this ♥♥♥♥.
and i know they are donating some of the money to his family but i have some problems with the way WB is doing this.
first of, ONLY if you buy this in the US are you donating money to the family and not even in all the states does this apply, and most of the sales are gonna be from outside of the US, i dont know if this is because of some legal issues but WB could still have said 'ok we will donate money to charity for all the purchases outside of the US' and it doesnt even have to be much, 3.50 from every purchase is going to the family so they could easily donate 2 bucks to charity for every purchase made outside of the US and they still would make profit.
my biggest problem with this is still the fact that they are making a profit of of someone dying from cancer, this is a scumbag practice and i wouldnt be suprised if they did this to take the attention away from the fact they have microtransaction in the game.
and totalbiscuit made a video about this and he does a good job of explaining the details about this.

[lawlessX]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVM5g4MFnzs

please watch if you're wondering whats going on with this DLC

[Valden21]

Wait, is this DLC going to be for SoM, or SoW?

[Rayu]

引用自 Valden21：

Wait, is this DLC going to be for SoM, or SoW?

SoW

[Rayu]

引用自 ds_60：

引用自 Rayujin：

WARNING!!! large wall of text. but i was just ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ pissed when i read about this so bear with me as i rant about this.
the fact that they are getting profit from someone dying is the worst case of day 1 dlc or even any kind of dlc i have ever seen, it is simply horrible from WB to do this ♥♥♥♥.
and i know they are donating some of the money to his family but i have some problems with the way WB is doing this.
first of, ONLY if you buy this in the US are you donating money to the family and not even in all the states does this apply, and most of the sales are gonna be from outside of the US, i dont know if this is because of some legal issues but WB could still have said 'ok we will donate money to charity for all the purchases outside of the US' and it doesnt even have to be much, 3.50 from every purchase is going to the family so they could easily donate 2 bucks to charity for every purchase made outside of the US and they still would make profit.
my biggest problem with this is still the fact that they are making a profit of of someone dying from cancer, this is a scumbag practice and i wouldnt be suprised if they did this to take the attention away from the fact they have microtransaction in the game.
and totalbiscuit made a video about this and he does a good job of explaining the details about this.

Then you're against compensating workers for operating their profession. So if you aren't compensated for your own work you better not complain.

that is not what i said.

[MythicalSnake]

Disgusting. WB is profiteering of a deceased cancer patient.

[LucidRaven]

引用自 Rayujin：

WARNING!!! large wall of text. but i was just ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ pissed when i read about this so bear with me as i rant about this.
the fact that they are getting profit from someone dying is the worst case of day 1 dlc or even any kind of dlc i have ever seen, it is simply horrible from WB to do this ♥♥♥♥.
and i know they are donating some of the money to his family but i have some problems with the way WB is doing this.
first of, ONLY if you buy this in the US are you donating money to the family and not even in all the states does this apply, and most of the sales are gonna be from outside of the US, i dont know if this is because of some legal issues but WB could still have said 'ok we will donate money to charity for all the purchases outside of the US' and it doesnt even have to be much, 3.50 from every purchase is going to the family so they could easily donate 2 bucks to charity for every purchase made outside of the US and they still would make profit.
my biggest problem with this is still the fact that they are making a profit of of someone dying from cancer, this is a scumbag practice and i wouldnt be suprised if they did this to take the attention away from the fact they have microtransaction in the game.
and totalbiscuit made a video about this and he does a good job of explaining the details about this.

They aren't making profit $3.50 goes to the family and $1.50 pays tax for having the dlc on the store. Yes, outside the US the money doesn't go towards the family but there are people who want the dlc regardless.

[$6.07 deluxe pawjobs]

If they didn't allow the DLC in areas where they can't donate the money then people would bltch and moan about not having it.

[Mercy]

引用自 Clades King of Spades：

If they didn't allow the DLC in areas where they can't donate the money then people would bltch and moan about not having it.

They could have donated it to a charity in foreign countries and the states that have restrictions. Pocketing the money just makes WB look greedier. Which they are.

[$6.07 deluxe pawjobs]

引用自 Mercy：

引用自 Clades King of Spades：

If they didn't allow the DLC in areas where they can't donate the money then people would bltch and moan about not having it.

They could have donated it to a charity in foreign countries and the states that have restrictions. Pocketing the money just makes WB look greedier. Which they are.

They posted in the same tweet that has the store DLC a gofundme where 100% of your donations go to the family. They also talked about that in the livestream. They can't donate the money made from the dlc in certain areas due to laws and there is a law about abusing and going around the law which is what they would be doing if they matched the profits and donated it.
EDIT:Also the guy they are honoring is the one that suggested this originally but died before they got to work on it.

[Humble]

Hmm, mabye they just use money to fund worker's wage and paid tax, is why mabye it's not 100% donations, so no donations to family or some donation to family? I guess some donations to family is better than no donations at all, while same time "100% donations isn't real unless worker willing to do it for free while goverment get their hand off of tax on those? Goverment is greedy as much as company, but worker need to make a living since living cost is lot of money for common folks, so in that case, is why there is no 100% donations, it's go hand to hand.