No multiplayer? No MGO4?!!

[beer is good for migraines]

Damn! Well I don’t know if I should be mad at Konami or mad at gamers for not playing multiplayer games unless it’s call of duty or MOBA

[dprog1995]

Multiplayer is much more competitive than the way it was in 90s and 2000s.

Also, don't know why you are mad at COD. I have played some Lan matches in Mordern warfare 1 and 2 and multiplayer is very good in those games.(In my opinion, multiplayer is what that saved those games since single player campaigns aren't that good in cod games)

[Solid Figura]

Originally posted by beer is good for migraines:

Damn! Well I don’t know if I should be mad at Konami or mad at gamers for not playing multiplayer games unless it’s call of duty or MOBA

maybe all the MGO might be planned for master collection volume 3.

[beer is good for migraines]

Originally posted by Solid Figura:

Originally posted by beer is good for migraines:

Damn! Well I don’t know if I should be mad at Konami or mad at gamers for not playing multiplayer games unless it’s call of duty or MOBA

maybe all the MGO might be planned for master collection volume 3.

Wow, all the MGO games coming back online would be great

[beer is good for migraines]

Originally posted by dprog1995:

Multiplayer is much more competitive than the way it was in 90s and 2000s.

Also, don't know why you are mad at COD. I have played some Lan matches in Mordern warfare 1 and 2 and multiplayer is very good in those games.(In my opinion, multiplayer is what that saved those games since single player campaigns aren't that good in cod games)

Well yeah they’re good but MGO2 was the best multiplayer game I ever played

[Deathraven13]

The game release in 6 month so maybe they'll drop MGO in the mix, but If they do I doubt that it would be good in the sense that If it doesn't have an anti cheat that will die quickly and If It does I doubt that MGO will make a profit to justify it, not that Konami really need money but still .

[🍕Chito the Hyena🍕]

It would be a bad investment from Konami to be honest. Not many people would play it besides some people that are curious to try it a couple of times or fans of MGO.

Many gamers expect every multiplayer game to keep pumping content for it or else they'll lose interest.

Sad but true. I'd love to play MGO again but I can see why Konami isn't going to do it.

[dprog1995]

Originally posted by 🍕Chito the Hyena🍕:

It would be a bad investment from Konami to be honest. Not many people would play it besides some people that are curious to try it a couple of times or fans of MGO.

Many gamers expect every multiplayer game to keep pumping content for it or else they'll lose interest.

Sad but true. I'd love to play MGO again but I can see why Konami isn't going to do it.

If they make a new MGO game they should release it as a free to play game imo.
Since that has to compete against newer titles such as Counter Strike 2 and the new Delta Force game.(And other multiplayer military shooter games)

[Pierce Dalton]

I'd love that but tbh it's not worth the time and money invested, it would die in some months.

[schicic]

Peacewalker should have coop in it. IDK if it would use the steam network or what, but it SHOULD have it. Coop and its multiplayer was a big part of peacewalker.

[Deathraven13]

Originally posted by schicic:

Peacewalker should have coop in it. IDK if it would use the steam network or what, but it SHOULD have it. Coop and its multiplayer was a big part of peacewalker.

IF MGV got co-op I don't see why MGS PW wouldn't have it.

[☣ βioClone λx-45 ☣]

They wasted the chance with MGSV... and this gets you surprised?

MGO 3 was millions worthy, and instead they moved into MGS survive, rather just sell the online part as individual product to increase playercount and popularity....

It just got killed the moment konami decided to stop investing a single penny into this production later the Kojima problem... also known as "phantom's pain"

[Deathraven13]

Originally posted by ☣ βioClone λx-45 ☣:

They wasted the chance with MGSV... and this gets you surprised?

MGO 3 was millions worthy, and instead they moved into MGS survive, rather just sell the online part as individual product to increase playercount and popularity....

It just got killed the moment konami decided to stop investing a single penny into this production later the Kojima problem... also known as "phantom's pain"

MGO3 was peer to peer and If the host dropped that was it, no anti cheat, so honestly there is no chance to make MGO3 profitable and If you think It will be like Overwatch 1 let me tell you this: LMAO you're crazy.

It doesn't help that the MG community is pretty small and that MGO3 isn't really a fast paced shooter COD style..... and the market is saturated too.

[☣ βioClone λx-45 ☣]

Originally posted by Deathraven13:

Originally posted by ☣ βioClone λx-45 ☣:

They wasted the chance with MGSV... and this gets you surprised?

MGO 3 was millions worthy, and instead they moved into MGS survive, rather just sell the online part as individual product to increase playercount and popularity....

It just got killed the moment konami decided to stop investing a single penny into this production later the Kojima problem... also known as "phantom's pain"

MGO3 was peer to peer and If the host dropped that was it, no anti cheat, so honestly there is no chance to make MGO3 profitable and If you think It will be like Overwatch 1 let me tell you this: LMAO you're crazy.

It doesn't help that the MG community is pretty small and that MGO3 isn't really a fast paced shooter COD style..... and the market is saturated too.

Add dedicated servers wont be that hard.... however if they are going to be like the ones from MGS2 almost I prefer its extinction because multiplayer "tournaments" were pure dice rolls... or full of killswitch.

No chance to make MGO3 profitable? one of the games that would be having easier to add customization options?

Slow paced? actually the game is not that much slow paced.. multiplayer rarely was slow pace unless those infiltration missions where it totally makes sense... are we going to ignore the huge gap it could use missing rivals like Ghost Recon or Splinter cell? cmon In a world where people play AND STREAMS "prophunt".

You almost sound like a suit guy saying how invest on something that cannot guarantee you a 1000% benefict is not worthy... I only miss the "they wont be able to sustain the servers"

[Deathraven13]

Originally posted by ☣ βioClone λx-45 ☣:

Add dedicated servers wont be that hard.... however if they are going to be like the ones from MGS2 almost I prefer its extinction because multiplayer "tournaments" were pure dice rolls... or full of killswitch.

No chance to make MGO3 profitable? one of the games that would be having easier to add customization options?

Slow paced? actually the game is not that much slow paced.. multiplayer rarely was slow pace unless those infiltration missions where it totally makes sense... are we going to ignore the huge gap it could use missing rivals like Ghost Recon or Splinter cell? cmon In a world where people play AND STREAMS "prophunt".

You almost sound like a suit guy saying how invest on something that cannot guarantee you a 1000% benefict is not worthy... I only miss the "they wont be able to sustain the servers"

I'm only saying facts.

If you want to make an online game that cost you money in the end go ahead.

[En.Ki]

Konami is a gamble corp. even got worst after Hideo left them ...
MGO was the best part of all MG series, the worst was MGSurv.
now they need my money and want to sell a crap overpriced product without Hideo...

dont fall for stupid corp.