MGS Delta is a steal at $69.99. Here's why.

[🍕Chito the Hyena🍕]

A remake of a classic. I paid $50 USD in 2004 for MGS3 on PS2. I paid about $40 for MGS3 Subsistence when it came out. I paid like $39.99 for MGS3D on Nintendo 3DS.

Also keep in mind that $50 USD in 2004 would be about $83.54 USD based on the quick Google search I did.

So $69.99 for this will be worth every penny. Great visuals, better animations, faster loading, crouch walking, over the shoulder aiming, camo shortcuts, 60 fps, etc.

[Delv]

its 116.95 in australian when normal games are 80-99 dollars......

[🍕Chito the Hyena🍕]

Originally posted by Delv:

its 116.95 in australian when normal games are 80-99 dollars......

Normal games are $80-90 in Australia. But those are "normal" games.

MGS3 is not normal. MGS3 is legendary and next level.

[🍃🪻🪷Sylvie🩵🍸🍵]

It cost a lot of money to remake the classic from scratch in Unreal Engine 5.

[Delv]

Originally posted by 🍕Chito the Hyena🍕:

Originally posted by Delv:

its 116.95 in australian when normal games are 80-99 dollars......

Normal games are $80-90 in Australia. But those are "normal" games.

MGS3 is not normal. MGS3 is legendary and next level.

Thing is if one company rises the cost then another one does it for games then it just keeps going and becomes a dumb standard...... its not a good thing and is damaging the industry

[Vagrant]

No.

[Fnx]

in short ur a consoomer

[Bullet Rain]

MGS1 and 2 are better than 3

[Dokferr]

Originally posted by 🍃🪻🪷Sylvie🩵🍸🍵:

It cost a lot of money to remake the classic from scratch in Unreal Engine 5.

SE put $50 price tag for Crisis Core Reunion.

[Metric Guard]

Originally posted by 🍕Chito the Hyena🍕:

Great visuals

Regarding aspects like the number of polygons and the resolution of textures, sure. However, the art direction is dramatically different. Or to put it more accurately, the devs stripped away most of the very deliberate stylization, resulting in far less distinct visuals.

faster loading

Areas are still segmented by fade-to-black loading screens, just like the original. Plus, I doubt the load times will be as quick as the Master Collection version since there's far more data to load.

60 fps

Every version of MGS3 after Subsistence—except the 3DS, PS Vita, and Switch ports—is 60FPS.

[Razör]

Originally posted by 🍃🪻🪷Sylvie🩵🍸🍵:

It cost a lot of money to remake the classic from scratch in Unreal Engine 5.

Oh boy, Unreal engine 5...so exciting and original. Can't wait for it to look identical to all the other "super realism" unreal engine 5 based games, with all the unoptimized jank and poor performance. Yay... so cool.

[Metric Guard]

Originally posted by ⁶⁶⁶:

the unoptimized jank and poor performance

It'll be real funny when Death Stranding 2 releases and has better graphics/performance than Delta despite its overwhelmingly larger settings.

[Ｔｅｎｓｅｎｕｍａ]

nice cope

[Showtgunner]

Hahahahahaha!

"Also keep in mind that $50 USD in 2004 would be about $83.54 USD based on the quick Google search I did."

Keep in mind that in 2004, life was less expensive, you did exactly what you told "quick google search"

[Superslimface]

lol i paid 30 quid back in the ps2 days to buy it the day it came out.

[Zένø™ 👌]

Originally posted by 🍕Chito the Hyena🍕:

A remake of a classic. I paid $50 USD in 2004 for MGS3 on PS2. I paid about $40 for MGS3 Subsistence when it came out. I paid like $39.99 for MGS3D on Nintendo 3DS.

Also keep in mind that $50 USD in 2004 would be about $83.54 USD based on the quick Google search I did.

So $69.99 for this will be worth every penny. Great visuals, better animations, faster loading, crouch walking, over the shoulder aiming, camo shortcuts, 60 fps, etc.

so you paid 130 bucks for a single videogame and now you want to pay another 70 bucks, so in total this game will cost you 200 bucks. Let that sink in and rethink your life choices