Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And I, for one, am glad for it.
Why chime in like an ass? Having a multiplayer aspect to the game would in no way whatsoever affect your playing the game. My friend and I like to play games together, and we had hoped that this could be one, because we enjoyed the old school Fallout games, and this looks like an improved take on them, and would have been fun to play.
I don't think he's being an ass. While I myself would love if I could co-op with a buddy through wasteland 2, I'm also aware that it takes a great deal of focus, time and money to add such features to a game. I'm glad they're using what resources they have to make the game as solid as possible. The sp experience is of the utmost importance.
good thing the game wont be $60 when it's finished.
Ok, then you continue to play your mediocre games that were rushed out to meet the market and get your money, while we patiently wait and support a company that is actually dedicated to producing quality games at optimal quality.
That being said, if Fallout 4 sucks I might just be done with the AAA industry.
i've been done with the AAA industry.. I'm not excited for Fallout 4 at all. Wasteland 2 ftw.