安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題的作者已將一篇留言標為問題解答。
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Looking at the review in question makes it even worse. Imagine claiming the story is milquetoast and unimaginative when you don't even know the basic plot outline. It's questionable if they even played it considering they claim the bosses are all practically identical. The reviewer even actually praised the boring stationary robot firing lasers down scripted hallways in the factory as a praiseworthy highlight of the game and not the actual bosses, heck the boss of that area even. Truly lower than pond scum.
It's video game journalists
You know ? thoses who struggle more than a bird on a simple task, even with the solution written on the wall ?
They don't play the game. they have bottom tier skill, and don't want to even try. If they do, they maybe play a hour or two to get the basic context, then shelve it. they just spout propaganda and paid advertisement.
a 7/10 is actually the bare minimum they give to a game that paid for it or is plain propaganda similar to theirs. 7/10 means "terrible game, but I can't give lower score". Actually, if something is given below 7 it has more chance to be interesting than a 7/10. They probabbly got bullied themselves by ennemies in the starting area and rage-quitted before the 1st boss, and used gameplay footage from other players
These people aren’t journalists. They’re glorified bloggers, clout-chasers, and cultural parasites. Most couldn’t tell you the difference between a renderer and a RAM stick, but somehow think they’re qualified to critique developers, tear down creative visions, and dictate what should or shouldn’t be allowed in a game. Half of them treat games as nothing more than platforms for political preaching or manufactured outrage.
And what do they contribute? Absolutely nothing. Just endless whining, dishonest reviews, and embarrassing "hot takes" that make it clear they’re not in this industry because they love it — they’re here to farm clicks and push their personal agendas.
But the real tragedy? People keep giving them the attention they crave. Sharing, quote-tweeting, rage-commenting — all of it feeds the algorithm. You keep giving them what they want: traffic. You're not “owning” them — you're keeping them employed.
It’s like watching someone repeatedly slap themselves in the face and scream, “Look how angry this makes me!” You’re part of the problem if you keep clicking. Full stop.
The only way these grifters die off is if we collectively stop acknowledging them. Don’t read. Don’t share. Don’t argue. Starve them. Support actual content creators, devs, and reviewers who care about games — not bitter dropouts who use gaming as a soapbox because nobody listened to them in real life.
Gaming journalism is dead. Let it rot. And stop dragging the rest of us down with you by pretending it's still worth paying attention to.
https://youtu.be/0hbuGQR5vrg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOjXaAZHEQE