Bodycam
Another negative review
Not that anyone here really cares just figured I would give my 2 cents anyway....

It's not that the game is bad, its pretty fun and it allows you to get a feel for what other games like Bodycam may feel like. Definitely a unique take on an FPS, and the zombie horde mode cam be fun.

It's only negative as its way too early access for me to recommend this game. It's not just the bugs, its how incomplete it is, the advent of purchasable in game skins does not help its image any. Sure they are skins, you don't have to buy them, I get that, its just the image it portrays by putting in $5 - $10 skins in game when you pay for the game to begin with.

I will be keeping my eye on the development of this game, I hope it comes along well as competition among games usually results in better games being developed.

However as of its current state is a Thumbs Down from me, with a recommendation to hold off until its more complete.
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
THE DOGS Jan 13 @ 9:31pm 
i dont think :steambored: this is where you leave reviews
All things considered with the development of this game.... they're doing great. The zombies mode was a genius move, they just need to scale up on content/maps, which is difficult for such a small dev team. So I'm still excited to see whats to come.
YoWutSup Jan 14 @ 6:54am 
I hope they expand on the zombie mode. More levels and perhaps different kinds of monsters.
Originally posted by THE DOGS:
i dont think :steambored: this is where you leave reviews

I left a very similar one on their product page in the store.
You never played the game, no mouse behind your name.
Originally posted by Zanka No Tachi, East:
You never played the game, no mouse behind your name.

Incorrect, I had just under 2 hours in. It has since been refunded by Steam, I purchased it during the winter sale at $26.65
Telling people a game isn’t complete as it’s quite literally an early access game screams retarded, honestly.
Also, the cosmetics are literally there to provide income for the devs as it’s a team of two. if you don’t like the cosmetics don’t buy them, and if that’s a turn off and helped you refund the game, just know your braincells are cooked because you definitely spent over 20$ on one skin in cod which is the same game every year.
Originally posted by FutileFart:
Also, the cosmetics are literally there to provide income for the devs as it’s a team of two. if you don’t like the cosmetics don’t buy them, and if that’s a turn off and helped you refund the game, just know your braincells are cooked because you definitely spent over 20$ on one skin in cod which is the same game every year.

Someone didn't read my post entirely now did they? Let me help you with that...

"the advent of purchasable in game skins does not help its image any. Sure they are skins, you don't have to buy them, I get that, its just the image it portrays by putting in $5 - $10 skins in game when you pay for the game to begin with."

I also have not played COD since Modern Warfare II. If you had said CS2 you would be correct but I also trade skins in CS2 and have turned $50 worth of skins into somewhere near $200 over 7 years.
Last edited by =SWF= Spartan0536; Jan 16 @ 1:00pm
Tr3m0r Feb 15 @ 2:24pm 
Originally posted by KixStix™:
Also, the cosmetics are literally there to provide income for the devs as it’s a team of two. if you don’t like the cosmetics don’t buy them, and if that’s a turn off and helped you refund the game, just know your braincells are cooked because you definitely spent over 20$ on one skin in cod which is the same game every year.

Ironic that you are the most angry rager for this game and think everyone is dumb and has brain rot, yet you say the most irrelevant ♥♥♥♥ in the forum. When a game that only cost 100k sells as much as this game did, the developers had two options. One is to reinvest quickly into the project and to build out a well staffed studio with the profits to actually make a complete and feature rich game. In addition to making a quality full feature game, the goal is to set them up to make more games in the future as well. It's a long term play that will assume more risks but given the smashing early success, those risks are tremendously lowered.

The other option is to consider it mission accomplished for being the first to market. The first game to market from the viral trending of Unrecord paid off. Because there are only two people, the profits are tremendous. The brothers don't really have coding skills which is why many features any "intelligent" gamer will notice, which requires hiring out a development team. This is possible with hiring a professional staff.

This didn't happen though. They posted a Pic of an empty studio lobby or something and barely hired anyone and the game has only had marketing and PR representation essentially from super emotionally regressive private profile children who want to be close to the Ballin 20 year olds. Its clear as day to anyone. There's ZERO reason to use micro transactions for supporting developers. Zero. The fact it's been built into the marketing scripting has rightfully been called out because it makes zero sense. Nada. Zilch. Suggestions like that only help people determine which projects to avoid and which are pretty low effort games. Thank you for that.

The fact you don't see this or you are indeed just part of the marketing scripting, still proves everyone's points that they have made. You don't disprove anything other than giving the game a terribly toxic vibe along with a bunch of others. You will realize this in a few years down the road. There's no flex to anything you say or contribute and frankly it's 2025, there's no reason to be ashamed of your gaming profile so just make it visible. No one cares about your collection of hentai.
Last edited by Tr3m0r; Feb 15 @ 2:28pm
OkaMeow Feb 18 @ 12:35pm 
Originally posted by STiZZy™:
Also, the cosmetics are literally there to provide income for the devs as it’s a team of two. if you don’t like the cosmetics don’t buy them, and if that’s a turn off and helped you refund the game, just know your braincells are cooked because you definitely spent over 20$ on one skin in cod which is the same game every year.
Pretty sure they made almost a million dollars off this asset flip, if not more, as I only counted the reviews. You don't need micro transactions in an early access game
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jan 12 @ 10:37pm
Posts: 11