Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Okayno, turn the settings down?
I mean you said it can run new games like tomb raider, but specs always help{not that it should really matter, most laptops can run this game on low with playable fps}
Intel Core i5 processor
like I said this pc never had fps problems on css before and notice i said Tomb Raider and Bioshock infinite on MAXED settings not low settings.
I tried rolling back my nvidia drivers for my gtx 660, turned vsync off, lowered some settings (i know css won't eat up my card), and to no avail.
my specs:
2600k
asrock extreme4-m
12gb 1600 ram
120gb patriot wildfire gaming drive
win7 64bit pro
This is completely false. This rumor quite possibly came from the fact that 24 FPS is a standard for the film industry. It's false nonetheless. I have run in-depth tests on the matter. The limit in which the human eye stops percieve a significant difference is, in fact, 60 FPS. You can refer to this tool to test it for yourself:
http://frames-per-second.appspot.com/
When it comes to first-person-shooters however, you can FEEL the difference beyond 60 FPS in terms of accuracy and stability.