Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The news from ASA:
https://ark.wiki.gg/wiki/ARK:_Survival_Ascended
use the... "shareware" versions until they are worthy of giving them your money again.... as impossible as it seems will ever happen
Ragnarok is going to be amazing.
Scorched Earth is eh.
Aberration is a VERY mixed bag.
Extinction will probably be good because it is mostly all outdoors.
Genesis 1/2 will probably be good because they are mostly all outdoors and the Island zone is going to be so beautiful.
I think the real question here is, can you run what is primarily a graphical upgrade of ASE on high settings or above so you can enjoy the key improvements? If not, ASA will look largely like ASE, have most of the same bugs/issues (with a few new ones) and give you access to a much reduced workshop etc.
I have an old GTX 1080Ti with 16GB RAM and have to use medium settings with volumetric clouds, water reflections and a ton of other stuff turned off to get 30-40FPS - is a graphical upgrade version actually an upgrade if you have to run it at lower settings than the original??