Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Those of us that have bought it and think it is worth it are happy with it and quite frankly don't care if you are going to buy it or not.
Never pay for the same game twice." That is an very presumptuous question and seems more likely rhetorical. Point is it seems you have made up your mind already and are just looking for an argument. While that may not be true, it definitely seems worded that way.
Advanced graphics features such as dynamic water (Custom FluidNinja integration), complete interactive physical foliage, and more systems to create a beautiful, immersive, next-generation experience.
Cross-platform Modding: we’re working with Overwolf to provide an industry-first cross-platform modding experience, where mods created on PC are delivered directly to your consoles from a custom modding backend and in-game user mod browser. The modding capability for creators includes using the full power of Unreal Engine 5, including Blueprint, to create anything, any kind of new content or gameplay, within ARK.
Full Cross-platform Multiplayer
New content, QOL improvements, balance, and gameplay changes, including but not limited to:
Over time we’ll be releasing 11 Brand-new creatures (More than any previous DLC expansions)
New mini-map system (pan, zoom, pings, etc.)
New structures (display cases, smaller TEK Teleporters, building pieces) & major building-system overhaul
New Gameplay Items
Dynamic navigation mesh and creature pathfinding overhaul (AI pathfinding)
Total UI Revamp
Photo Mode
New camera systems for players and dinos, with the option to revert to the old systems.
New Player Character Assets with Revamped and Improved Customization
Gamepad virtual-cursor UI input system
New Dino-Manager system (view the real-time status and track-locations of all your creatures at will through one unified menu)
… and much more!
I trust devs who created Ark more than your assumed definition of a remake.
And that's just a stupid label. Who cares if someone says "remake" or "remaster"? Are the textures different? Yes. Are the models different? Yes. Are the sounds different? Is the music different? Yes. Is the engine different? Yes. Is the core functionality of the game the same? Yes
So who gives a flying crap what it is labeled? I don't care if the devs call it a remake or some asshat on the forum calls it a remaster or anything else. The label doesn't matter as it's simply a different product, and that just absolutely cannot be argued no matter how hard anyone tries.
but i must be honest and say only some of the models are updated.... like the Raptor, most are original
True, but trees, rocks, ruins, basically anything that can be harvested or destroyed are all new. Building materials, weapons, armor, etc... it's all new.
"The devs would never lie to me, because they care."
Remake is recreating the game.
Remaster mostly uses the original code/assets with some updates/QOL or in this case taking advantage of UE5 features.
These are not my definitions. Mislabeling it as remake is objectively false.
"ARK’s codebase has been rewritten" which is also questionable at best since they are using the same broken netcode from ASE and 8 year old bugs were ported to ASA.
Words have definitions for a reason. There's huge difference between remaster and remake.Which is borderline false advertising. Also for a guy who claims he doesn't care you want to make sure everyone knows how much you don't care which is kinda self contradicting.
The only valid question you asked is: "Are the textures different?"
Rest of your questions are structured incorrectly.
At best they should look like:
"Did they change some of the models?", "Did they change some of the sounds?",Is the engine different version?(Because no the engine is the same its just a newer version of the same engine, that's why you can import assets/code from ASE instead of recreating everything) etc.
They imported most of the model assets from the old game and gave them QOL to fit UE5 like the new knockdown animation, feathers having physics etc. They recreated/created few assets from scratch like some of the tree models/character models and stuff like armors related to character models, other models like smithy got very minor changes.
2) what did you say?
https://docs.unrealengine.com/5.1/en-US/updating-projects-to-newer-versions-of-unreal-engine/#:~:text=Click%20the%20image%20for%20full%20size.%20Click%20the,it%20and%20open%20it%20in%20the%20current%20version
try learn to read and then you will be able read it
good luck, you will need it
btw: arent you millenial?
because it will explain a lot!