wow

[negligentWarren]

rtx 3070, r7 5800x 3d, 32gb ram and this runs like absolute dog piss. i love ark and hope they fix this soon.

[BEEP!]

At least you had DLSS so you at least have something to lean on but for non NVIDIA it's a nightmare there's no FSR which is crazy to not have.

[negligentWarren]

Originally posted by 1080puktra:

At least you had DLSS so you at least have something to lean on but for non NVIDIA it's a nightmare there's no FSR which is crazy to not have.

dlss doesnt do much here i had to look up how to do things like turn off volumetric clouds and fog to get to 50-60

[whiterspon]

Originally posted by Warren.:

rtx 3070, r7 5800x 3d, 32gb ram and this runs like absolute dog piss. i love ark and hope they fix this soon.

lol I have 3080ti and same processor but 32Gb Ram more and all good on my side then maybe problem is not inside the game

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by Warren.:

Originally posted by 1080puktra:

At least you had DLSS so you at least have something to lean on but for non NVIDIA it's a nightmare there's no FSR which is crazy to not have.

dlss doesnt do much here i had to look up how to do things like turn off volumetric clouds and fog to get to 50-60

For the qame to even be playable for me which is 60fps at minimum with a RX6800 & 5800x3d I had to basically turn everything off to the point it might as well be the original game again but still somehow look worse across the board I could play Ark the original at basically max settings and be around 70-90fps at all times but this game to even be near 60fps I had to turn off everything it looked like a game from the early 2000s which defeats the point of the whole new engine and graphics.

[Undeathical]

Originally posted by whiterspon:

Originally posted by Warren.:

rtx 3070, r7 5800x 3d, 32gb ram and this runs like absolute dog piss. i love ark and hope they fix this soon.

lol I have 3080ti and same processor but 32Gb Ram more and all good on my side then maybe problem is not inside the game

Imagine needing a $350 graphics card, on top of the other components to handle that card, to play a $45 game decently well. This is not going to be sustainable until the cards that can handle UE5 get cheaper for the average players . I have a rtx3070, and Im not paying that just to play this .-.

[negligentWarren]

Originally posted by whiterspon:

Originally posted by Warren.:

rtx 3070, r7 5800x 3d, 32gb ram and this runs like absolute dog piss. i love ark and hope they fix this soon.

lol I have 3080ti and same processor but 32Gb Ram more and all good on my side then maybe problem is not inside the game

optimization issues mean varying results across the player base. dont be ignorant

[StawacZ]

Originally posted by Undeathical:

Originally posted by whiterspon:

lol I have 3080ti and same processor but 32Gb Ram more and all good on my side then maybe problem is not inside the game

Imagine needing a $350 graphics card, on top of the other components to handle that card, to play a $45 game decently well. This is not going to be sustainable until the cards that can handle UE5 get cheaper for the average players . I have a rtx3070, and Im not paying that just to play this .-.

Congrats and Welcome in The World of PC Games. You all want to play Next Gen Graphics with 200 Euro Hardware...3070 at the current State is not that Good to play every Game on Ultra Settings with High FPS. Its a Mid Class Card from last Generation..what do you Expect?

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by StawacZ:

Originally posted by Undeathical:

Imagine needing a $350 graphics card, on top of the other components to handle that card, to play a $45 game decently well. This is not going to be sustainable until the cards that can handle UE5 get cheaper for the average players . I have a rtx3070, and Im not paying that just to play this .-.

Congrats and Welcome in The World of PC Games. You all want to play Next Gen Graphics with 200 Euro Hardware...3070 at the current State is not that Good to play every Game on Ultra Settings with High FPS. Its a Mid Class Card from last Generation..what do you Expect?

But this isn't a next gen looking game it's not even close people are having to lower setting to such lows that this game starts to look even worse than the original game lol the problem is the game and the performance is straight up one of if not the biggest complaint about the game hell it caused me to refund because they didn't add FSR to help my RX6800.

[Caduryn]

Originally posted by Undeathical:

Originally posted by whiterspon:

lol I have 3080ti and same processor but 32Gb Ram more and all good on my side then maybe problem is not inside the game

Imagine needing a $350 graphics card, on top of the other components to handle that card, to play a $45 game decently well. This is not going to be sustainable until the cards that can handle UE5 get cheaper for the average players . I have a rtx3070, and Im not paying that just to play this .-.

Imaging complaining about 350$ for a GPU in 2023....

Thats absolute low end Hardware

[StawacZ]

Originally posted by 1080puktra:

Originally posted by StawacZ:

Congrats and Welcome in The World of PC Games. You all want to play Next Gen Graphics with 200 Euro Hardware...3070 at the current State is not that Good to play every Game on Ultra Settings with High FPS. Its a Mid Class Card from last Generation..what do you Expect?

But this isn't a next gen looking game it's not even close people are having to lower setting to such lows that this game starts to look even worse than the original game lol the problem is the game and the performance is straight up one of if not the biggest complaint about the game hell it caused me to refund because they didn't add FSR to help my RX6800.

it is. At the Moment ill play the ASE because of some Friends play..old Ark looks like PS2 in comparison. you have to turn everything max with every thing you can activate and the difference is huge.
ill use 3080ti and can put most things on /high/epic and it lookes awesome.

[StawacZ]

Originally posted by Caduryn:

Originally posted by Undeathical:

Imagine needing a $350 graphics card, on top of the other components to handle that card, to play a $45 game decently well. This is not going to be sustainable until the cards that can handle UE5 get cheaper for the average players . I have a rtx3070, and Im not paying that just to play this .-.

Imaging complaining about 350$ for a GPU in 2023....

Thats absolute low end Hardware

this

at this Point i feel mid with my 3080ti. next year 4090 is mine :)

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by StawacZ:

Originally posted by 1080puktra:

But this isn't a next gen looking game it's not even close people are having to lower setting to such lows that this game starts to look even worse than the original game lol the problem is the game and the performance is straight up one of if not the biggest complaint about the game hell it caused me to refund because they didn't add FSR to help my RX6800.

it is. At the Moment ill play the ASE because of some Friends play..old Ark looks like PS2 in comparison. you have to turn everything max with every thing you can activate and the difference is huge.
ill use 3080ti and can put most things on /high/epic and it lookes awesome.

I can play ARK original on nearly max and be at 70-90fps but this game I had to turn everything off to the point it looked worse than the original it straight up looks like a game from the early 2000s to barely hold 60fps and have drops down to the 40-50s and there's no FSR to help out which is crazy not to have there's clear problems and guess what you have $700-$1000GPU so of course you don't have problems your straight up have a PC strong enoughe to brute force past all the problems which the vast majority of everyone else simply can't hell my RX6800 is only 10% slower than a 3080 and I had to turn off basically everything for it to be semi playable and no it's not next gen at all there are plenty of game's that blow this out of the park dating back from the 2015.

[StawacZ]

Originally posted by 1080puktra:

Originally posted by StawacZ:

it is. At the Moment ill play the ASE because of some Friends play..old Ark looks like PS2 in comparison. you have to turn everything max with every thing you can activate and the difference is huge.
ill use 3080ti and can put most things on /high/epic and it lookes awesome.

I can play ARK original on nearly max and be at 70-90fps but this game I had to turn everything off to the point it looked worse than the original it straight up looks like a game from the early 2000s to barely hold 60fps and have drops down to the 40-50s and there's no FSR to help out which is crazy not to have there's clear problems and guess what you have $700-$1000GPU so of course you don't have problems your straight up have a PC strong enoughe to brute force past all the problems which the vast majority of everyone else simply can't hell my RX6800 is only 10% slower than a 3080 and I had to turn off basically everything for it top be semi playable.

sry but you are trolling. go to YT searching for Video compare...there are Worlds between both Games...if you didnt see the difference you are simply trolling. Dont need to talk more

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by StawacZ:

Originally posted by 1080puktra:

I can play ARK original on nearly max and be at 70-90fps but this game I had to turn everything off to the point it looked worse than the original it straight up looks like a game from the early 2000s to barely hold 60fps and have drops down to the 40-50s and there's no FSR to help out which is crazy not to have there's clear problems and guess what you have $700-$1000GPU so of course you don't have problems your straight up have a PC strong enoughe to brute force past all the problems which the vast majority of everyone else simply can't hell my RX6800 is only 10% slower than a 3080 and I had to turn off basically everything for it top be semi playable.

sry but you are trolling. go to YT searching for Video compare...there are Worlds between both Games...is you didnt see the difference you are simply trolling. Dont need to talk more

Did I ever say there wasn't a difference read again I said I had to turn the setting low and off to the point it looks worse than the original game which I could play maxed so no not trolling.
And those nice graphics would be nice if I and the majority of everyone could actually play with them without being in the 30-40s I have a standard for gaming and it's not sub 60 which is why I refunded I'm not a console gamer that likes to play at 30fps.

[StawacZ]

Originally posted by 1080puktra:

Originally posted by StawacZ:

sry but you are trolling. go to YT searching for Video compare...there are Worlds between both Games...is you didnt see the difference you are simply trolling. Dont need to talk more

Did I ever say there wasn't a difference read again I said I had to turn the setting low and off to the point it looks worse than the original game which I could play maxed so no not trolling.
And those nice graphics would be nice if I could actually play with them without being in the 30s.

Again,what do ya expect with a low Level Graphic Card? you get Low Level Performance..its not that hard to understand...the Original Game turns to EA in 2014(?) ..its 10 Years ago..sure you can play this on max because it looks like....