Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
40 dollars with 15 hours in and that means i paid 2.25 an hour ish for 15 hours of fun
I havent really noticed any gameplay changes. Its the same ark with new graphics and animations.
But otherwise i have to agree with a few points. I have a 2000$ pc. 3060Ti, i7-12700kf, buncha ram, samsung 980 pro ssd. There is no reason i have to run this game on low-medium to get 60fps. if i want to go higher i have to use console commands to disable volumetric clouds. This pc took me months of work to get (not all of us have cushy well-paying jobs), but it runs every other game i have at max settings no problem. Elden ring, ArkSE, those games it has no problem with. This game is definitely an exception. And because i have to turn everything down, it looks.... comparable with ASE, maybe even worse sometimes depending on what im looking at (sometimes better but only when nothing is moving, frame rate issues make things in motion look gross on higher settings).
Not to mention, all over the southern and south eastern area of the map (because thats all ive been able to explore right now) there are quality control issues. Things like dinos getting stuck in terrain and rocks/grass hovering over the terrain EVERYWHERE. I get bugs, crashes, fps issues, this stuff shouldve been caught when they were making the map.
Just because it has the potential to look better doesnt mean its actually gonna look better. Whats the point of spending so much time and effort maximizing the graphics if most people cant even run it like that (or at all). I wouldve rather had minor graphics improvements and took all the quality of life stuff and animation changes rather than get a game that tries to make my pc detonate.
The only reason i dont like the price tag is because of the state its in. If it was more optimized and didnt have quality control issues i wouldnt care as much. I would call the product poor quality, and yet they sell it to you in the state its in.
That is the longest sentence I have *ever* seen.
Good job!
Wow you spent thousands of dollars to play about 12 games most of which you bearly got a couples of hours on. Are you a snail games employee ?
At the same time, I'm happy that they've promised all future content will be free. It does look better than the original. And if your computer isn't 10 years old, you'll have a good time.
I would certainly hope you would be satisfied with a $6k computer.
Also, 1k laptop with a 4080? Can i get a link and/or additional specs?