Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In addition it is much too small for LMU, you need a 3070ti for 1080/120hz and 3080ti for 1440p/120hz (and even when it works knowing Nvidia).
I tested an old 2080 gaming x trio that I had and compared to a 5700XT it has 21% fewer fps and the drop is violent.
All of the developers in S397 use nvidia based graphics cards.
There was a problem with the AMD graphics cards crashing at 100% load, nobody at s397 knew about it, because nobody uses AMD.
They had to buy 1 AMD graphics card to test and fix the issue. (Read Change Logs at the bottom).
https://steamcommunity.com/app/365960/eventcomments/4034724270484591102/
Set your in game resolution to 1080p, and lower the graphics settings.
The problem is i already did all that abd it changed nothing at all, another thing is that the gane looks like ♥♥♥♥ on all settings and its not better or worse if i use it on max settings so i really think it has nothing to do with graphics
I've been with AMD (ATI before) since 2007 so when I started rF1 I was still on nvidia and it crashed all the time.
On rF2 or LMU I never had any problems apart from the menu lagging when the game came out (which I no longer had after a week) and I never had a crash at 100% or no no matter what other loading and yet I tested 34 different GPUs of different architecture and different generation (from the 280X/290/290X to the 7900 XTX).
I also tested the rare Nvidia ones that I still have (because 3/4 are all burnt out or broken down or just falling apart) and the game crashes either at the end of a loading or during a change session or when leaving a server, the loading bug at 48% while the driver was freshly installed, crashes of the nvidia driver itself also and that on the 780/780ti/980/1080ti/2080 and even a 3070 that I had been loaned.
Besides in 1080 the 290X runs perfectly at 105/110 fps in hight, post process in low, msaa x4 while the 780ti struggles to output 60/70 in medium/low and post process disabled, no msaa and fxaa enabled ^^.
To finish all the SPC that I have assembled in 18 years under AMD (I don't count Nvidia) we have no worries either, even small cards like the RX470/480.
It has been highly documented all over the internet, that users with AMD graphics cards were crashing just after the loading bar reached 100%.
NOBODY IN S397 HAD A AMD GRAPHICS CARD, so the problem was not spotted. S397 had to buy 1 AMD graphics card, to find out the new surface optimisation function in AMD's driver was not compatible with rFactor2. The fix only came out in November last year.
If no one uses AMD graphics cards at studio 397, do not expect hardware support from them.
In addition, I am dsl to say it but the sgen s who have problems with AMD as well as cnvidia, people are generally bad with a PC and do not know how to use it and cause (or cause) problems themselves nonstop.
You know, the problem is often between the chair and the desk and I find that this is true in 90% of cases.
They have never been able to match and even less surpass ATI/AMD in this segment except once following a bug in the design of the chip at AMD (the RX 480 which was equal to the 1060 6go very quickly exceeded by the corrected version which are the RX580).
I can give you a link which shows the 780/780ti being crushed by HD 7970 which is comical all the same or even a Vega 64 overtaking a 2080 in ray tracing software.
I have several like this.
In my eyes, if you buy entry-level/mid-range cards, it seems to me that you can't afford it; therefore it is ridiculous to take Nvidia knowing that it is less efficient (and sometimes by a lot), it consumes more and it heats more and it is always more expensive by 15 to 30% depending on the model.
Which means that the price/performance ratio is catastrophic and I'm not even talking about the problems with the driver or the GPU itself.