Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Empty = bad, Full = good.
So I don't know.
Maybe this is just another one of the completely arbitrary issues of the game.
I went with RPGs and Adventure games, they need similar features, i think strategy and action need similar needs too, so it could be possible to focus on action or strategy and do both, just not 100% perfectly.
So now you cannot hire badly skilled people, they just draw a paycheck and produce nothing.
About employee you hire, there's a first phase where they aren't fully operational and when you make a game the game provides a message mentioning the employee not yet fully operational. Training, make contracts or make him do reports, make games, perhaps make him research, I think all of that help get rid of this phase.
Yeah employees you hire that have lower design/tech skills produce significantly less bubbles even after the first phase. But research points are so important that I wonder if really the research skill should be ignored when you hire, I don't know, for now when I play a relatively normal game I tend try focus a lot on research. Logically it should lead to a faster growth.
But fire and hire is definitely something I need try and haven't yet experiment. With that approach that would be hire with best skills in tech/design, later when you have quite more money fire and hire high level employee with a stronger focus on research.
Don't over-complicate this. If you need to focus your entire team on a task and have been trying but to no avail, it's because your team doesn't have enough to focus on.
For example, if you have 20 people focusing on a single project fairly, each will only focus on 5%. Whereas, if you have 2 people focusing on a single project fairly, each will focus on 50% and they will be more focused on their part because it's more important.