安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I acutallly 'finished' the game succesfully a few times with the versions before 1.4 with no use of the wiki at all. You just have to apply a bit of common sense.
I'm looking forward to seeing this new "game report" feature - hopefully, it can take some of the guesswork out. I admit that it can sometimes be a bit cryptic, escpecially once you start combining genres.
Common sense doesn't work when the game decides what works and what doesn't. I agree that it ruins the experience, but not knowing what is working also ruins your experience.
It doesn't matter how good games you release, even if they are better than the other games released by other companies. You always compete against yourself and need to release better games each time.
I've fired people from my company and developed games with better scores, but with less people... It's just crazy.
And let's say you develop an action military shooter, does it help to add steering wheel to that for tech. points or not? Game just doesn't tell you. Maybe it's good to ad all features in even if that doesn't add any value to the game.
Without wiki I would never know that Lvl 1 3D is worse than lvl 3 2D
I realy like the new game report feture, it fixed a lot of the problems with not knowing why your game did well or not
I feel no fun in "discovery" since I just get bankrupt and start over...