Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But, no, no native controller support.
I think the game has joy-stick support becuse that was all the rage for FPSs for quite a bit, but that's about it. Still not something I'd recommend for a game this old, though.
i just wanted an option to play on my "steam machine" that I built for my big screen tv.
Can respect that.
But although SS2 is quite time-less in many ways, the controlls are horrible dated in that 'let's go the flight-sim route and have one button for every little action' way PC games were infamus for for quite awhile.
You MIGHT be able to map enough actions to a gamepad for it to be playable, but not even nearly as much as with a mouse and keyboard.
Still, I'd reccomend you try something else as the first game on that set-up. You're just going to get really frustrated otherwise.
maybe that steam controller will make it viable. we'll see...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8m-ydOiJ9CY
System shock is showing at around 6:30 time...
We're in 2017 so alot has changed in the two years since this thread was written and it's not a D&D rpg so the interface can be dealt with quite easily.
Worse comes to worse, there's that contoller app on Steam anyway ;)
Tbh, I think it's just as ignorant as someone in a fighting tournent saying "You'll never beat me with a controller, I have a superior fightstick".
I've seen people with controllers beat m+kb in any fps, without auto-aim, I've also seen people use a 4,000dpi trackball mouse beat people with 16,000dpi mice. If you don't believe me, feel free to look it up on youtube. Sometimes it's more about what people are comfortable with over the tech behind it BUT this is a single player game so I'm not sure what any of that has to do with the original statement I made.
seen a video where the Angry Video Game Nerd was playing a Doom source port with a controller a couple of weeks ago, and it was painful to watch. controllers are great for your Mortal Kombats and Final Fantasies, but if need to shoot a guy's left eye out.. not so much. and it matters little whether it's in MP or SP (I actually do watch SS2 LPs quite a bit, and ones where a controller is being used are instantly recognizable - "oh god what's wrong with this guys controls? ah, he's using a controller..").
ah, there you are;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVtDsQ5L_oc
But that's just me, maybe someone can. I seriously doubt any controller is good in a competitive setting, but SS2 isn't a competitive game, so a controller should work fine.
It all comes down to personal preference. Besides, I didn't watch every multiplayer match in history so maybe someone out there is better with a controller than mouse and keyboard.
How do you know that the people I'm talking about are playing against people who aren't good with mouse+keyboard? I'm talking about highly skilled/evenly skilled players on both end. Not sure how you can prove me wrong except for saying "Believe me" or something silly like that.
Have you ever been to an actual tournament which has people who use both controller or kb+m? I can tell you haven't because the usual kb+m user will tell you that a high level kb+m user will smoke a high level controller user every time which isn't the fact. For those of us who have actually seen it, we can know that it's not about the hardware but about player creativity, sheer skill and strategy.
As I said before, if what you were saying is true than this wouldn't exist:
https://youtu.be/WcbREL1Ve10
https://youtu.be/q_Ak0ZNEf8g
The proof is in the pudding, I don't have time for petty arguments.
This is a good educational video for you:
https://youtu.be/i1YwHxl-rPU
Trying to convince someone of the myth that hardware = skill was never true to begin with. Next you'll be telling me that Hollow Knight is better played with kb+m when kb+m has a delay that controllers don't or that racing games are better with kb+m when triggers are far better for racing games. Being into pc gaming sincethe late 80's and witnessing the evolution of the gaming scene in general has taught me well.
Still, again I'm confused why you made claims in the first place when this is a single player game. Seems like an strange argument to make, as what I said originally was targeted for this game specifically.
https://youtu.be/ipvGE5FkJRE
"If you do well with controller against a team of elite veterans than you are a hacker who uses aimbot, etc etc." Simply for the fact that they couldn't handle being beat by someone who uses controller, therefore fights it or refuses to acknowledge that it can even happen in the first place.
Keep in mind that I am a keyboard and mouse user generally and only really use controllers for racing, fighting and platforming games as those games usually have some delay when using keyboard an mouse anyways.
Still I like to give credit where it's due, without bias but only featuring knowledge.
Here is another prime example of someone with a controller smoking elite keyboard and mouse players, if you cannot tell that they are then you may not be familiar with the game at hand:
https://youtu.be/LnAbjp0EKsw