SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS:

[D.A.R.K.]

MINIMUM: Everything that will release in 2035.
RECOMMENDED: Something it will only exist in 100 years.

Dude, I'm really thinking this game is a scam, this graphic can't be so real, it looks like someone filmed this interaction in a real place, and then placed some game hud and effects. This game looks too real to be true, no offense.

[Cman1337]

Originally posted by D.A.R.K.:

MINIMUM: Everything that will release in 2035.
RECOMMENDED: Something it will only exist in 100 years.

Dude, I'm really thinking this game is a scam, this graphic can't be so real, it looks like someone filmed this interaction in a real place, and then placed some game hud and effects. This game looks too real to be true, no offense.

Sorry to dissapoint you buddy but here is a video of the prototype of the game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU7YX5SY8zY&t=0s

You can download and play it. It's from the same dude who are making this game now.

[D.A.R.K.]

Originally posted by Cman1337:

Originally posted by D.A.R.K.:

MINIMUM: Everything that will release in 2035.
RECOMMENDED: Something it will only exist in 100 years.

Dude, I'm really thinking this game is a scam, this graphic can't be so real, it looks like someone filmed this interaction in a real place, and then placed some game hud and effects. This game looks too real to be true, no offense.

Sorry to dissapoint you buddy but here is a video of the prototype of the game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU7YX5SY8zY&t=0s

You can download and play it. It's from the same dude who are making this game now.

Do you see it's different, right? I'm looking at the video and it seems the guy took a real place and put in the Unreal Engine 5 as asset. The trailer footage is from the real place to marketing the game, while the asset is there to "proof" it isn't a video.

If you pause and go frame by frame both videos, area by area, you start to notice that there are small differences and details that aren't consistence between both, which means the game play trailer isn't a game play from Unreal Engine 5, but a video filmed in the real places that they used to make the map.

We already saw a lot of that in the past, the last scandal about it was The Day Before. We know companies like Ubisoft does a gorgeous trailer to "reduce the graphics" when the game releases. We know companies like Blizzard reduces drastically the graphic potential to bring more people to play the game.

So... With all of that, I still believe the trailer isn't game play, but video footage.

[Cman1337]

Originally posted by D.A.R.K.:

Originally posted by Cman1337:

Sorry to dissapoint you buddy but here is a video of the prototype of the game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU7YX5SY8zY&t=0s

You can download and play it. It's from the same dude who are making this game now.

Do you see it's different, right? I'm looking at the video and it seems the guy took a real place and put in the Unreal Engine 5 as asset. The trailer footage is from the real place to marketing the game, while the asset is there to "proof" it isn't a video.

If you pause and go frame by frame both videos, area by area, you start to notice that there are small differences and details that aren't consistence between both, which means the game play trailer isn't a game play from Unreal Engine 5, but a video filmed in the real places that they used to make the map.

We already saw a lot of that in the past, the last scandal about it was The Day Before. We know companies like Ubisoft does a gorgeous trailer to "reduce the graphics" when the game releases. We know companies like Blizzard reduces drastically the graphic potential to bring more people to play the game.

So... With all of that, I still believe the trailer isn't game play, but video footage.

You never heard of photogrammetry? Both Star Wars Battlefront reboots use it heavily. The places in the Trailer are literal UE5 assets as I heard. Yea it is possible to make it look as real as it is, especially if you use filters like this game.

[D.A.R.K.]

Originally posted by Cman1337:

You never heard of photogrammetry? Both Star Wars Battlefront reboots use it heavily. The places in the Trailer are literal UE5 assets as I heard. Yea it is possible to make it look as real as it is, especially if you use filters like this game.

Explain to me what photogrammetry is, I don't know.

Do you know assets aren't purely made by graphic designers from 0, right? The majority of them are scans from real things in the world, real props and real places. It looks like Epic Games went to this place, in real world, and made an asset of this place. I don't know from where the developers are, but it's plausible to go to the same place, make a movie there, place some effects, and then say it's real trailer game play.

The Day Before made a fake game play trailer, Ubisoft does that since Far Cry 3, the most genius thing would marketing the game like that, people only knows about this game because of this, it's the highest sell point of the game. Game play is really common compared to any other FPS, the graphics is the different factor from all other games.

[Cman1337]

Originally posted by D.A.R.K.:

Originally posted by Cman1337:

You never heard of photogrammetry? Both Star Wars Battlefront reboots use it heavily. The places in the Trailer are literal UE5 assets as I heard. Yea it is possible to make it look as real as it is, especially if you use filters like this game.

Do you know assets aren't purely made by graphic designers from 0, right? The majority of them are scans from real things in the world, real props and real places. It looks like Epic Games went to this place, in real world, and made an asset of this place. I don't know from where the developers are, but it's plausible to go to the same place, make a movie there, place some effects, and then say it's real trailer game play.

You literally described photogrammetry right there.

[Cheyenesku]

Originally posted by Cman1337:

Originally posted by D.A.R.K.:

MINIMUM: Everything that will release in 2035.
RECOMMENDED: Something it will only exist in 100 years.

Dude, I'm really thinking this game is a scam, this graphic can't be so real, it looks like someone filmed this interaction in a real place, and then placed some game hud and effects. This game looks too real to be true, no offense.

Sorry to dissapoint you buddy but here is a video of the prototype of the game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU7YX5SY8zY&t=0s

You can download and play it. It's from the same dude who are making this game now.

Play it? Its like one corridor, no guns, no sound and it runs terribly. As I said somewhere else - i asked a dev about it. The only way its anything more than walking sim, is if locations are really small and there is very little enemies with braindead ai. There is a reason other UE5 games dont look like this.

[D.A.R.K.]

Originally posted by Cman1337:

Originally posted by D.A.R.K.:

Do you know assets aren't purely made by graphic designers from 0, right? The majority of them are scans from real things in the world, real props and real places. It looks like Epic Games went to this place, in real world, and made an asset of this place. I don't know from where the developers are, but it's plausible to go to the same place, make a movie there, place some effects, and then say it's real trailer game play.

You literally described photogrammetry right there.

Oh... I think I know what it is. I made a quick research on google. Yeah, it looks like Photogrammetry, but the game play trailer doesn't look in-game footage, more like a video made or using Photogrammy or whatever, and THEN set to look like in-game game play, something similar to what The Day Before did.