ติดตั้ง Steam
เข้าสู่ระบบ
|
ภาษา
简体中文 (จีนตัวย่อ)
繁體中文 (จีนตัวเต็ม)
日本語 (ญี่ปุ่น)
한국어 (เกาหลี)
български (บัลแกเรีย)
Čeština (เช็ก)
Dansk (เดนมาร์ก)
Deutsch (เยอรมัน)
English (อังกฤษ)
Español - España (สเปน)
Español - Latinoamérica (สเปน - ลาตินอเมริกา)
Ελληνικά (กรีก)
Français (ฝรั่งเศส)
Italiano (อิตาลี)
Bahasa Indonesia (อินโดนีเซีย)
Magyar (ฮังการี)
Nederlands (ดัตช์)
Norsk (นอร์เวย์)
Polski (โปแลนด์)
Português (โปรตุเกส - โปรตุเกส)
Português - Brasil (โปรตุเกส - บราซิล)
Română (โรมาเนีย)
Русский (รัสเซีย)
Suomi (ฟินแลนด์)
Svenska (สวีเดน)
Türkçe (ตุรกี)
Tiếng Việt (เวียดนาม)
Українська (ยูเครน)
รายงานปัญหาเกี่ยวกับการแปลภาษา
I know that, didn't you read what I wrote? "You are technically/legally correct", but that is not the point. Making a game DRM-free is nothing everybody does or even want to do, because you need files and programs and, most important, you should know what you do and where you get these things. Because of that I wrote "simply do what you want". Cracking DRM is not simple for everyone, but right-click->copy->start is simple...
Yeah, and that is the big thing which let them stand out in comparison to other stores, that this is a must-have to bring your game(s) to their store.
Really? You can't just imagine why someone is bringing up a fundamental point into the discussion to substantiate the argument? I don't want to buy a game just to look if it is DRM-free (Steam) when there could be a possibility for just knowing it when you buy it (GOG).
And this would be so unrealistic? It hasn't to be on purpose just for doing it nonetheless.
P.T. says hello...
I read what you wrote. But "This is simple and this is hard" was never a point of contention and it's fairly subjective anyhow, rather that's something that you inserted. In fact, I would argue that most people would download games from the GOG launcher rather than the website, too. Downloading the installers and all the additional files and then preparing them so your kids know what to do with them is actually relatively complicated if you've ever tried that before, especially with updates. You kinda have to know what you're doing. All the while, using a Steam emulator isn't much more complicated either, you just download the .dll file and put it in the game folder for virtually any Steam game, that's usually it, very straightforward. And so you can, and especially with DRM-free Steam games, do the same thing with Steam.
But again, the problem is that the discussion was about "I can put a game on my hard drive and give it to my children after I die" while arguing legal stuff along with it, when there is no actual legal difference between GOG and Steam. This needed to be made clear, whether you like it or not, because people have been conflating this in this thread. So again, don't bring this to me, there's people misinformed about this and unfortunately using it to form their argument. I would have ignored it otherwise.
But this is completely irrelevant to the actual point of contention. Why do you keep on this yet become really irritated I clear up what game licenses are? Seems a little hypocritical.
Yeah, really. You're asking the developers here. If they say "Yes, the game will be DRM-free everywhere", then there you go. You don't need to "figure it out", and you don't need it to be on GOG if your goal is to have it DRM-free. I'm not sure if you're even remotely logically following the situation we're in here.
This is kind of like if you had a bully and your goal was that they stop bullying you. So you decide to make a plea. Your plea is that you ask them to move to a different country so they can't bully you anymore.
Why not just ask them to stop bullying you instead of this roundabout request? Especially since your proposed solution leaves us with unsatisfied parties (for the sake of argument, the bully doesn't want to move), as your request indicates you're fine with Steam customers having to deal with DRM while it's DRM-free on GOG, which is unfair.
Hence it makes little sense and the request is not straightforward, bearing an unfortunate, misinformation-laden assumption that Steam couldn't have DRM-free games (it would seem that way for other people new to gaming and reading threads like this at the very least). I genuinely don't want any game to end up in a situation where it has DRM on one platform but not on another, and the fact that GOG advocators are seemingly fine with that outcome rubs me the wrong way, too. Why NOT request the game to be DRM-free period? You just make yourself come across as a GOG fanboy, IF you are aware of this but just detest Steam enough to not even bring it up.
When I said everywhere else, it was still within the context of the other big PC stores that we were talking about, i.e. Steam and Epic. P.T. is PlayStation / console
To shed more light on the situation I'd like to point out that I follow the StopKillingGames campaign closely, and while its goal is to let people have ownership over their purchased game licenses, and leave the games in a functional state of course, at no point is it said that a platform like GOG is required to achieve this goal. Everything else would indeed be misinformation. You'll find a lot of people who are aware of DRM unfortunately parroting "You need GOG, there's no other way, you only own your games on GOG", and that's misinformation that is getting more and more on my nerves the more I see it repeated everywhere. You're not getting to invalidate purchases on other platforms like that. It's not true. Neither Steam nor Epic mandate DRM, nor should the eventual outcome of DRM be that you lose access to your purchases. GOG isn't the ultimate solution, what we need is updated legislation that mandates customers can keep playing their games they paid for.
Any other benefit of the GOG platform IS NOT the point of contention and IS NOT something I EVER argued against. I'm frustrated with them refusing to support Linux, but otherwise I like them.
What? Subjective? No, sorry, but comparing to download any files, which you found in the internet, to modify your game/folder instead of just downloading and installing the install package of the officiall launcher is, for me, objective more user-unfriendly/harder/riskier.
What in the world should be complicated? O_o
You seem to forgot/read over about the other thing which I wrote, because "complicated" was not the only one: You have to know where you get these (not really legal) things, and with this things it starts to get a little bit more complicated than just starting/handling with an installation folder/exe.
And again, aren't we long over the point of legal stuff?
I already said that you are right with that, how many times do we want to talk about it?
See the points before, we seem to have it in common to bring up points which have already been discussed xD.
No, not really, or do you see a response here in this thread for nearly a month?
...
Phew...
Ok, I try to be calm. And again: I don't know if a game is DRM-free on Steam, how many times do I have to say this ? It's not the point if games can be DRM free on Steam (I have never denied that!), because if I don't see it before I buy it, then the whole discussion is obsolete.
(And please, you can save your framing with some fanboy accusations and stick to arguments, or are you start to missing them?)
A guy said: They want this game on GOG so it can be DRM-free and they can own the game, not just access to it.
I corrected them saying that games can be DRM-free on Steam and that you always buy access to games.
That's IT. That's all I said. Then another person jumped in for that last person and argued a bunch of things I never said (clearly out of ignorance about what DRM-free and game ownsership is, however), and then you jumped in for THAT person and argued a bunch of things I never said. I don't care that you like installers from the source, I don't care that you think you know games are DRM-free on GOG, I don't care that you feel you can put games on a hard drive and give them to someone else after you die, I don't care where games can be downloaded after being delisted, I don't care what you think is user-friendly or risky, I don't care, I don't care, I don't give a flying ♥♥♥♥, I never said any of these things! They don't relate to DRM or legal game ownership! I made absolutely no other point other than that! Stop arguing this with me!
For crying out loud!
That said, there's some... erroneous stuff in that last reply I have to address else I'd go insane:
...then WHAT makes you think they're listening to you and putting it on GOG??? You expect THAT to happen but NOT a reply to questions??? Logic please?
When you ask the developer to make a game DRM-free and they say YES or NO, then you don't know whether it's DRM-free?
WHAT?
...WHAT??
---WHAT???
Also, the sake of completeness/information, you can check https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Home and look up whether a game is DRM-free
But your answers and reactions here tell a different story! :D
(And again, where do I praise GOG? O_o I just said that every game there is DRM-free. This is just a fact, no praise, or are you already thinking up things that I have never said, but criticizing others for doing exactly that?)
Yeah, quoting another person of course always means that the person never said that, I forgot...
Huh, never said. Are you sure you don't mean yourself with my previous quote from you?
But you waste a remarkable amount of text and energy for not caring...
Are you serious? They (for example, the publisher) could read comments and don't respond (because they are not the developers), quite easy. So hard to imagine?
Yeah, WHAT is exactly what I'm thinking after reading your comments...
How should I know if it's DRM-free when the developer don't react?
Do you already forgot what you wrote?
So here we have the case to figure it out by ourself, when the developer doesn't react, no? Do you understand it now? If not, read your own comments please...
Typed in the first 5 games of my wishlist + Nikoderiko, found just 2 (and not Nikoderiko). So yeah, sometimes yes, sometimes not it could be a help.
But thanks for that nevertheless! (Never thought of saying this after this whole discussion!^^)
They can make the game DRM-free on Steam so GOG isn't required for that, and games are sold in the form of licenses, including on GOG. That's it. That's all the claims I made. Stop replying to me if you want to talk about anything else
Show me where I have done this, will be interesting to see! :D
You literally told me that I shouldn't explain to someone how game licensing works, when THEY STARTED talking about game licenses and how they own the game on GOG. Then you told me that the point is that you know a game is DRM-free on GOG. There is no universe where that was ever the point to anything I ever said. All of you replying to me without understanding or bothering to read the original context are just digging a deeper hole of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ responses to things I never said. As I said, like some twisted telephone game where each person continuing the discussion becomes more and more clueless to what the point even was, and what I actually replied to. So I'm ending this.
Thanks for proving my point with continuing by not responding to my question to show the quoted passages!
And again, for you:
"Interesting: You claim the right not to reply to the thread creator and to reply to someone else instead, but you deny others this right? Sure, you can do that, but then you shouldn't be surprised if you get a counter..."
That should make the proof of a passage easy, shouldn't it?^^
Who accused whom of twisting someone's words again?
I quoted you, but you don't seem to be able to quote me when I'm asking you. But I'm not surprised, strong language is a wonderful sign of running out of arguments...
Mmh, didn't I read that before?
You seem to care, so it will be exciting to see if you keep your word this time. My guess? No xD
Nope, didn't twist anything. Perhaps English isn't your strong suit, or you forgot what you said, but this is indeed telling me I shouldn't explain how game licenses work... in a discussion about game ownership, mind you.
Yes, thanks for reminding me that you put words in mouth. Even after you quoted me and it says nothing remotely like you claim it says. Cool beans. Like I said, if your reading comprehension is this bad, what am I supposed to do?
I do care... about you putting words in my mouth, which makes this statement most ironic. Because, as you do, you're putting words in my mouth regarding me not caring about you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ting me which I never said. Quoting someone doesn't mean you're innocent if you so blatantly rip those words away from their context.
Haha, wow, Ok, so I said that you are correct and then I put my thoughts into it, and this is, for you, twisting your words? Wow, just wow, and then you tell me I can't read xD.
Maybe remember things better? Is this so hard that I have to quote you every time?
Please tell me when my comments are to long, then I can make them shorter so you don't forget what I wrote and that you put words in my mouth. Literally (I mean, look at my quote from you), and not just from an interpretation (like you)...
Aha, let's see:
Interesting way of ending things! Or did I just put words in your mouth, even with this quote? Seriously, I don't know anymore xD.
You say there are out of context, I say there are not. And when I see your reactions and strong language then I feel safe for being right actually. Another example which I already brought up:
Jep, still true, you put words in my mouth and don't even say something about it, even when I draw your attention to this, so sad...
And? I never said that you are wrong?
Bringing up points into a discussion don't have to be about just the things already said. That's what you call a discussion. It was about licences, and I added that you're right, but that there are still differences. That's it. That's all I said. And then you get so involved and see things somewhere that aren't there, insult people here, use strong language there, etc. etc.
And seriously: Since you're throwing around expletives here, what's with the friend invitation? So that I can read through your accusations again in the chat?
Acquire some ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ reading comprehension. Stop putting words in people's mouths.
On a factual level of course, but not after you behave like a child here and throw around swear words and insults. Grow up first, then we can have a personal discussion.
Seems both true for you, too, as I showed several times.
And the blocking seems to work absolutely fine I see, or do you (again and again...) say something and then forget about it?