Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Aside from this, it really doesn't matter. The games are very self-contained.
Starting with Order of Ecclesia is perfectly valid.
Portrait is a sequel of the Sega Genesis Castlevania: Bloodlines, where's the protagonist isn't a Belmont, since it's a fast gameplay you can play it first, or just watch a gameplay video, the protagonist is Jonathan's father and Eric Lecarde have a bigger role in Portrait but I won't will spoil.
Aria of Sorrow comes before Dawn and it's considered the last Castlevania chronologically, Aria of Sorrow is a wonderful game and I totally recommend the gameplay.
Note that Order is the most weird of the trilogy and Dawn is the most normal.
I mean, if you want to get into the whole story chronology thing, then... they kind of ARE sorted by that? Ecclesia takes place in the 1800s, Portrait takes place in 1944, and Dawn is in 2036.
I highly advice you to not start with Order of Ecclesia if you never played any GBA/DS Castlevania games before.
Start with Portrait of Ruin wich is the easiest to play and the easiest to discover the games genre, then do Dawn of Sorrow