Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
2060 super, 32gb of ram, and ryzen 9 3900x 12 core. No problems for me at all running the game. Seems optimized well, imo.
I guess so.
PROS: Story is rebellion/ally-focused, unlike most FC games which are villain-focused. Rebels are genuinely really cool and realistic, rebel storyline and ally story is like 9.5/10. Really compelling
-Gameplay is less broken late-game and feels more intense and oppressive.
Cons: certain features(suchas flying) are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ broken and feel terrible, also aren't realistic or effective.
The game, instead of holding your hand like past games, gives you zero tutorial and refuses to explain basic ♥♥♥♥ and some key bindings aren't in the main menu.
TLDR: Gameplay and allies storyline is 9/10. Optimization is like a 2/10.
as far as similarity? It's the far cry formula, BUT it makes so much improvement that Far cry 4-new dawn look pathetic in comparison. The change in the formula from far cry new dawn to this game, is the kind of change that should have happened every game prior. It feels like the true sequel to FC3 in an alternate timeline where far cry 4-new dawn never existed.
It was never bad in the first place. I first bought this game on Epic, when it first came out, and beat it, then bought it again on steam not long ago. It's played fine both times.