Europa Universalis IV

Europa Universalis IV

Ver estatísticas:
7/set./2021 às 6:00
1
Development Diary: New Missions for Mali
Let's talk about upcoming content focusing on Sub-Saharan Africa

Confira o anúncio completo:
https://steamcommunity.com/ogg/236850/announcements/detail/2970675385930722184
< >
Exibindo comentários 226240 de 297
Stride 11/set./2021 às 9:53 
Game remains broken. The community does nothing but explain to you that the game is broken.

Solution: More paid content to break it even more!

Honestly sorry they threw a new Dev to the wolves here but the reality is what it is.
☄STING☄ 11/set./2021 às 11:44 
Finally africa update <3 :steamthumbsup:
Rick 11/set./2021 às 11:46 
I'm all about more alt-history stuff being added to the game, but the entirety of the dev team needs to be focused on fixing the previous update before pushing out new content. I refuse to buy any future products from paradox until the previous update is fixed.

I don't understand how this company can justify adding new content while the old is in such a horrible state. Imagine seeing your basement flooding with water because of a plumbing mistake and thinking, "I think it's time to build a new deck, the one I have is getting old." This is honestly ridiculous, and I can't imagine how this company thinks any of us will tolerate it.
Última edição por Rick; 11/set./2021 às 12:00
Quimera 11/set./2021 às 12:35 
Escrito originalmente por Apache:
Escrito originalmente por PDX_Moderator_2:
This is a great example of non-constructive criticism.

this criticism is constructive. constructive does not equal polite
criticism equal to be polite, not rude and harsh, they shouldnt tolerate your BS.
Quimera 11/set./2021 às 12:36 
Escrito originalmente por Abyssinian Empire:
Could you please add more provinces to this region? There are extremely large(especially when you consider the Mercator projection making equatorial regions smaller) It is hard for a Mali(or songhai) to compete with European powers without unrealisticaly blobbing into kongo or the Huasa when in real life the Mali Empire at its height far dwarfed the European leaders in population with a whopping 20 million people, around 8 times England in 1500 as shown by https://www.blackpast.org/global-african-history/mali-empire-ca-1200/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population_in_1500 and https://www.tudornation.com/what-was-england-like-in-1500/. Obviously, it would be dumb to make Mali this powerful at the start as it had a major plague outbreak a little before EU4's time and it having lost around 1/2 of its territory, but Mali controlling its peak territory should at least make it bottom rank great power, instead of it having around a pitiful 150 dev(if even that!). In addition, Mali's borders are wrong! Here is a rough look at its borders throughout its time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TjWn91p-bg.
Events to continue Mali's decline if reforms fail, events that lower dev of provinces should be included, as Songhai was more of a regional power than a global one and after Songhai, the region fell to obscurity.

Thank you and I apologize for long post.
this one nailed it :goldensmile::steamthumbsup:
Quimera 11/set./2021 às 12:40 
Escrito originalmente por Lombii:
Escrito originalmente por Quimera:

He was junt pointing one and for god shake the obviusly the worst one to show us what shouldnt be the rule when there is an exchange of devs and might or might not be customers/fans. So chill down if you take that personal because it is obviusly you care to too much like to show up some kind of reason. I would prefer if PDX´s devs couldnt show up but only for dev diaries because to answer honestly to hundred of people IT IS NOT THEIR JOBS, ok? So glad if you couldnt bother to answer again.

"Like the customer service, the way you treat people, the way you intereact with people not agreing with you etc. Not doing with a nice tone, not doing it with respect for any of you. But that doesn't mean my critics aren't valid." Yes, not example, like i said: a hater.

A moral base is needed and it is obviusly you lack ot that not matter how many words you are capable to type, no-one have to deal with "harsh and brutal" because those are the tools of a troll, keep spreading BS like "dogmatism" and that BS of "on the psychology and sociology one about marketing and how to manipulate crowd like politics" you are of the same kind but worse it is obviusly you are expereinced in that and with too many time to answer and typing a lot w/o saying any new idea but "you PDX are bad and you dont hear us".

So pls, before you dare to post again answer me this: who is better and have more participation and feedback of the community than PDX? EA, CDPR or Creative Assambley? ahahah hater gonna hate.:notagree::colt::mortis:

Congratulations on defending the leviathan dlc and the way the new developers and managment treated the game recently, you just outdone yourself

Also your writing is so horrendous i really want to puke. I hardly can understand what you are saying
dont care lmao, English is trash language, lmao.



Escrito originalmente por Stride:
Game remains broken. The community does nothing but explain to you that the game is broken.

Solution: More paid content to break it even more!

Honestly sorry they threw a new Dev to the wolves here but the reality is what it is.


Escrito originalmente por Rick:
I'm all about more alt-history stuff being added to the game, but the entirety of the dev team needs to be focused on fixing the previous update before pushing out new content. I refuse to buy any future products from paradox until the previous update is fixed.

I don't understand how this company can justify adding new content while the old is in such a horrible state. Imagine seeing your basement flooding with water because of a plumbing mistake and thinking, "I think it's time to build a new deck, the one I have is getting old." This is honestly ridiculous, and I can't imagine how this company thinks any of us will tolerate it.

The fact that there is new content incoming, it doesnt mean they werent working in fixing the previous one, they already did a lot after a month of the launch. Which one is the problem? the fact that Native American Nations form empires or the ability to "concentrate development" is op??


Escrito originalmente por Mr. Nobody:
At the date EU4 starts, Mansa Musa was already dead for 100 years, but who cares about historical accurateness, except most of EU4 players...
Bold to assume this game is an history book and not a game that justify her mechanics and cores with some history lession. Mansa Musa might be dead a long time ago, but for sure the gold mines stay there after his death.
Addie 11/set./2021 às 13:58 
Oh boy more paid content
Mr. Nobody 11/set./2021 às 14:05 
Escrito originalmente por Quimera:
Bold to assume this game is an history book and not a game that justify her mechanics and cores with some history lession. Mansa Musa might be dead a long time ago, but for sure the gold mines stay there after his death.

You clearly never really played EU4. This game tried to be as correct as possible for a long time (from the players perspective). People who tended to play PDX games tend to love this kind of perfectness. Maybe you are not one of those who played their games for over two decades. Sure, PDX doesn't need to stick with those who supported them from the very beginning. On the other hand, It is never a good idea to forget where you came from, but if they loose everything, there is always anybody waiting to fill the gap.
Marva 11/set./2021 às 14:50 
Escrito originalmente por Mr. Nobody:
Escrito originalmente por Quimera:
Bold to assume this game is an history book and not a game that justify her mechanics and cores with some history lession. Mansa Musa might be dead a long time ago, but for sure the gold mines stay there after his death.

You clearly never really played EU4. This game tried to be as correct as possible for a long time (from the players perspective). People who tended to play PDX games tend to love this kind of perfectness. Maybe you are not one of those who played their games for over two decades. Sure, PDX doesn't need to stick with those who supported them from the very beginning. On the other hand, It is never a good idea to forget where you came from, but if they loose everything, there is always anybody waiting to fill the gap.
The systems have never been designed for that. They just introduce concepts for players to abuse.
Inquerion 11/set./2021 às 16:19 
Escrito originalmente por Quimera:
Escrito originalmente por Abyssinian Empire:
Could you please add more provinces to this region? There are extremely large(especially when you consider the Mercator projection making equatorial regions smaller) It is hard for a Mali(or songhai) to compete with European powers without unrealisticaly blobbing into kongo or the Huasa when in real life the Mali Empire at its height far dwarfed the European leaders in population with a whopping 20 million people, around 8 times England in 1500 as shown by https://www.blackpast.org/global-african-history/mali-empire-ca-1200/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population_in_1500 and https://www.tudornation.com/what-was-england-like-in-1500/. Obviously, it would be dumb to make Mali this powerful at the start as it had a major plague outbreak a little before EU4's time and it having lost around 1/2 of its territory, but Mali controlling its peak territory should at least make it bottom rank great power, instead of it having around a pitiful 150 dev(if even that!). In addition, Mali's borders are wrong! Here is a rough look at its borders throughout its time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TjWn91p-bg.
Events to continue Mali's decline if reforms fail, events that lower dev of provinces should be included, as Songhai was more of a regional power than a global one and after Songhai, the region fell to obscurity.

Thank you and I apologize for long post.
this one nailed it :goldensmile::steamthumbsup:

Sure, they should add even more useless provinces, even though the game is mostly unplayable, due to lack of optimization, after 1600.

In my opinion, optimization, fixing bugs and balancing game mechanics, should come first.

Mr. Nobody 11/set./2021 às 17:39 
Escrito originalmente por Bullet:
Oh my God stop adding such unbalanced stuff.

I hate this new dev team.

Over years they nerf each and any mechanic into dead to "balance" it and then they bring in stuff that drives it into absurdity. Imagine, America is the best developed part of the world before 1600, but you earn less from colonies and trade than stupid taxes, even at low developement.

They use us as free alpha tester. They experiment with what ever sh1t is in their mind, because we already paid for that bs and after they have let us paying for they developing experiments over DLCs, they do not pay us for the work, no they will sell us a new game to start this process again.
Marva 11/set./2021 às 19:37 
Escrito originalmente por Inquerion:
Escrito originalmente por Quimera:
this one nailed it :goldensmile::steamthumbsup:

Sure, they should add even more useless provinces, even though the game is mostly unplayable, due to lack of optimization, after 1600.

In my opinion, optimization, fixing bugs and balancing game mechanics, should come first.

The provinces obviously aren't useless. They add dev, goods, room for tags, and they fill out the map. They're the strongest factor in the game.
TheEzrat 11/set./2021 às 20:46 
LETS ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ GOOOOOOOOO
Venboven 11/set./2021 às 20:53 
Escrito originalmente por LonelyCookie:
Jesus christ, are you fcking serious, now EU4 is getting the HoI4 treatment where you start with garbage modifiers and disasters?
Hey I like this feature. It's fun to roleplay your way out of the disaster, and it will usually end up with you getting permanent buffs in the end.
国窖1453 11/set./2021 às 21:09 
这不得驯个龙?
< >
Exibindo comentários 226240 de 297
Por página: 1530 50