Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeah. That's a number that's been mentioned in the dev diaries somewhere, but I forget which one.
Flavor seems to just be more streamlining of the game with way too overblown useless mechanics that will be brocken just like Imperators at launch.
I think you are spot on, Johan could not admit IR wasnt perfect and that he isnt a genious.
He got so butt sore about IR and now he wants to roll his ground(game) breaking mechanics into the EU series, if Project Caeser is EU5
That's my take on it, too. And Vicky 2 is roughly tied with Stellaris as my second-favorite Paradox title.
Time will tell if he's truly learned from his hubris or not.
The way the devs were saying it, there is about 60 nations with as much flavour as current EU4 England (which was an internal goal for them). There are also quite a few nations that have some flavour, but not as much (no idea how many though). And this number of 60 could rise before launch too.
If it's current then that's a pretty significant amount and 60 is definitely a good start. Hope it's mostly the major nations though. If somebody big is missing out on flavour in the base game (Byzantium in CK3!) that'd suck.
How is this relevant?