Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
It was mainly put there in case he didn't know about the upgrade function and expected it to happen automatically, thus leaving his ships outdated =)
If naval combat had been like this historically nobody would have colonized anything before 1800's because there wouldn't have been any ships as every nation would have been bankrupt ever since they built their first ships (which according to EU4 cost half a year's national income each) and lost them all just because the enemy had one ship more.
And some more constructive ideas:
Don't fight naval powers unless you can afford throwing away hundreds of ships to gamble them down, or just move around with 1000 heavy ship stack and hope you can find an enemy.
Ships *were* prohibitively expensive during this time frame. EU4 is actually giving the player a very generous fantasy that you can builld hundreds of ships and rule the waves on a dime. The fact in this can be seen in Ming China who had the largest navy ever built until the 20th century. Their navy was so expensive they outright banned it for almost making them bankrupt (they also had over half the world's GDP during that time).
The fact that any nation in this era...any...can build armadas in the sheer numbers given is ludicrous. Even the mighty Spanish Armada numbered less than 300 (the majority were merchant ships with crude cannons attached last minute).
Enjoy the fun before it is nerfed, as it should be.
England's navy was more OP? How so? Even after the 1588 defeat, Spain remained the undisputed naval power in the region. England tried but failed in offensive pursuits after that battle. England was good at defending its own territory during this epic events, but it didn't mean they were OP. You also can't attribute weather and disease to the National Ideas lol.
You also forgot about the Dutch. They helped England out during the Spanish attempted invasion of England. Also knowledge of weather paterns is not a fluke. England knew their seas, weather, and teritory The English and the Dutch pretty much kited the Spanish armada around the British isles. Spain was arrogant and thought their large fleet could easily beat the English. It was not a fluke.
After the Spanish armada was defeated, Spanish power began to decline, British power began to increase. Britian relied on privateers and priacy. In 1700, 1800 and 1900 hundreds Spain was just a ♥♥♥♥♥ pawn to France, Germany and oher European powers and Britain remaned a world player. Today Sapin is weak and England is a pawn to the USA. Today new world former colonies like the USA, Mexico, Canada and Brazil are just as strong and rich as European countries.
I didn't forget about the Dutch. Nor was it part of the subject.
England had no idea about the weather change. You will find no proof of your assumption.
None of the other information in your profanity laden response has any relevance to why you think the game doesn't give justice to the Engish navy.
Failed response bro.
1. the Eruopeans have no man power Issues in the New World
2. England , Spain and France are allied when they hit the New World.(This has played out 3 times so its a fixed mechanic)( MM , France and Spain hated England for converting to the reform. ) England lands on what becomes Newfoundland in the Mid 1500s, Spain has not got to Mexico yet. (Real History , The first English Conlony at Plmymounth acually faild , England wasnt able to estalish a conoly in the New world till Jamestown and that wasnt till 1607 and that took over 20 years to settle , it almost faild due to manpower issues , because of conflicts with the Natives. so this Idea that England Colonized the new world in 15 years as the game plays out is false.)
3. Why as a Native do I need Cause Belli to declare war on Eroupeans ? I acullty I should be able to raid colonise without declaring war (Might want to borrow the tribal system from CK2)
Dutch is part of the subject to why the Sapnish armada failed to invade England. They helped Engalnd out. The Nertherlands were once Spanish subjects and wanted to keep their independance so they helped the English out by not giving Spain access to their ports. The English and anyone that lives in a certain area can not predict the weather but can see paterns and know when winter or storms are coming (like Russia when Napoleon and Hitler tried to invade them). Also the English ships were faster and more manoverable than the Spanish ships. The English channel and north seas are rough and the English knew it, the Spanish failed to see it.
This all has relevance to the game because it is based on history and England had a kick ass navy during the time period of the game. A lot of research went into the game so some nations are better at certaint aspects. Englands national ideas help its navy but so does Venice`s ideas. Between the late1500s to the late 1800s Britania ruled the waves. Now the USA does.