Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If a foreign heir wins the election it's a weak one. If your own heir wins it's a strong one.
I only played poland once since the change, but i don't remember any troubles at all. I just let a foreign heir win every time and sit on low legitimacy without any problems. Maybe pick humanism ideas for less revolt risk and to prevent some disasters.
Civil war is actually very easy to deal with. Just let it happen and let the rebels sieze your capital. They're replace your king (generally with a worse one, unfortunately) and the civil war is over for ever.
It's kind of like the peasant war, where all you actually have to do is accept the peasants demands (and take a huge prestige hit, but it's better than actually dealing with the peasants war).
The civil war only advances if OE is 10% or more. That means that I can go to war and take provinces just so long as they don't sum to more than 2 base tax (because you get 4 OE for each point of base tax). That basically means only taking one province per war. Slow, perhaps, but better than standing still.
I like the idea of just letting the civil war happen and getting it over with, though, so I think I'll give that a shot.
Thanks for the help guys.