Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That is entirely okay - I wasn't sharp earlier with Ironman mode so that started a squirrel wheel for me.
I would do the same if purchasing Hearts of Iron IV, because I did learn my lesson and play that without Ironman mode if buying something like this game. With exception I would like a Crusader Kings III with few dozens of achievements or something something..
you arent a real gamer until you get the impossible Until Death Do Us Part
I do like to read and watch guides for achievements :D Paradox wiki was a true goldmine when playing the Crusader Kings II (Now I have 25 of 161 achievements there and I'm thinking that I am now Edward the Longshanks
Oh, achievement hunting is just modern way to collect something similar like stamps. I think that stamp collectors have same kind of addiction or anything else what can be make a collection.
On the EUIV case, achievements are diverse enough to renew your experience of the game and test plenty of strategies. For the hardest one, they require a lot more optimization and therefore knowledge of all intricated parameters. So it's stimulating enough and not too repetitive.
The addiction part of a Paradox game from the last decade is more related to DLC hoarding than achievements.
41 of 373 seems doable and pretty amount of achievements and also giving some quality time with EU IV while someday reaching there. Still, it is undecided how much more or less playing this game- I don't have much open gaming projects for now.
Usually getting the feeling that gaming companies and Valve do not much appreciate the art of achievements. Seen also some gaming studios to remove small part of achievements from their games. Luckily players keep achievements from closed games at least for now.
But I have always played Ironman so just picked them up over the years.
It must be like a tasty chocolate for you
The word addiction has latin origins and meant to devote oneself, sacrifice, sell out or abandon.
The first use of addiction was a person who was enslaved by a court.
Using original/early definitions to devote yourself to achievements would mean you are an addiction.
Achievements are just opportunities to learn more of the game. when you think you understood the game and have no more fun with it, go for a new achievement !
I do already understand some of the basic mechanics. Before when much bother with Steam I did play EU III (disc version with Divine Wind) many hundreds of hours. Although it was much simpler game the rhythm of speed was very near of EU IV.
I was only asking where is the honor of different amount of achievements
None and all. It is all about each one.
I'm not an achievement hunter, in fact I don't care about them, but for some reason in this game, after some runs I wanted to play no matter what, I play with the idea of getting them. Will I get all? I don't know, maybe I will get fed up of it and abandon the hunting and uninstall the game, or maybe I will keep going until I have them all, time will tell, but in any case it will be my decision and nothing wrong with any of the "endings", why care about what others think about it?