Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm totally honest. I honestly love their business practices. EU4 has gotten 11+ years of post release development because of the DLC model. This continually reinvigorated and deepened the title. But the Paradox Tinto studio doesn't work for free. Developing new content requires paying salaries and benefits, buying equipment and office space, and making a profit. No business that fails to do these things exists for long.
After 8000 hours of EU4 playtime, I can say without hesitation that on a dollars spent per hour played basis, it's been the cheapest game I've ever bought by an enormous margin. That's why I love their model. It provides colossal value.
I also keep reading about supremacy over the crown but i never saw it among the possible estate choices. (Only an audience is now available for 10 influence and 10 loyalty.)
I used to play ages ago and even then i dont seem to recall it since the diet is very good.
I recently restarted and i keep seeing it everywhere being mentioned and suggested, even on the wiki. I checked 4 different country starts in europe none of them had it as an option. (I played one till 1650 and it still never appeared)
So i have mixed feelings.
If we add to the mix the "launcher necessity" which is basicly a reverse improvement, i am more inclined to not engage with paradox anymore. And i wanted to buy stellaris for a while, but eventually i just said meh.
I really hate launchers.
Most of the time they add nothing to the game, just require you to make an account, or to market their other products. Which is not really needed, since Steam and other retailers already show/can show all the other products. So it is just something completely redundant and quite annoying.
I know, i checked it. But did not see anything like for Reformation Fervor-> Wealthy nations mentioned.
But now watching it on my horizontal screen (and not the vertical) i see that there is a small symbol at the end of the line.
Guessing that means the emperor DLC is required.
(Not really user friendly arrangement though)
Hurrah! Hurrah! Hurrah!
In other words, time to reset the counter, it has been 0 days since one of these has been posted.
How much money you already spend in your life to make the 1% richer and the 99% poorer should make you go insane right now.
They've also simplified their DLCs so much, even in their older games like EU4. In Eu4 they've re-organized things so that you do not have to buy 100 different unit packs or the, like, 2 different monument packs, or the separate DLC just for Muslim advisors??? It's all one pack that's 33% the cost of the originals.
If you want them to stop being a live service, yeah, that's never going to happen. But I think it's undeniable: they have listened to the push back and have changed their way of doing things.
Stellaris is just a bad game that's poorly managed. Like the ship of Theseus but instead of building the same ship it's a worse and more convoluted one after each iteration.
It's also their only, developed (they've published others), 4x game and imo it shows.
*Virtue signal virtue signal misunderstand life and existence and poorly communicate my thoughts. Me me me I'm right, there is no deeper discussion to be had here. I am the most right person in the Universe. Youuu are wrooong and that makes you a baaaad peerson. SMILERS*