Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And it's not because they had "more than 1 vassal", it's to show that they had little centralised power. The dukes had a large degree of autonomy so having them all as part of a single unified country isn't entirely accurate.
Plus they start with the "French Duchies" privilege which gives +3 diplo slots, so they're hardly wasted since they get extras to account for the vassals anyway.
If you play EU4 you could get the impression, that there already existed something like modern states in the 15 century, which are fully (or to a very large degree) under control of the king. In the 15th century this was clearly not the case. Nations are unrealistic in EU4, because you have too few vassals, not too many. Duchies were very powerful and influental, much more than they are currently in EU4. This system called feudalism persisted until the 18/19th century. The rise of modern nation states did not really start before this time, maybe only with a little step into this direction in the era of absolutism.
If you want it have realistic, your "nation" would consist of almost only vassals.
Than you are clearly got it wrong. France at the time of EU4 was fragmented as f*ck by numerous duchy with various right and title. France often considered where feudalism maintained longest relevance among major european nation
that can *really* screw them over if they aren't in a good shape to win that war. i've seen france getting demolished and later on completely deleted from the map after that event several times.
the vassal thingy at the start is just a minor flavor adjustment. sure they'd be even stronger if the vassals were already integrated at the start, but AI france usually integrates them soon anyway, so it just slows them down slightly in the first 20 years or so.
Not necessarily, as mentioned vassal swarms can be pretty powerful.
Which is only the most important part of the game...
In the current patch it's around 40/60 or worse that France manages to knock England off the continent and become a power. The only country I see generally under-performing compared to history in the current patch more than France is the Ottomans.
Burgundy seems to lose to France in wars more often also. Only nerf that France really got was that the unholy alliance between France and Ottomans never happens because of the -50 opinions modifier due to completely different religious group as in the past I think it was -10 or -20.
In the hand of the player, yes.
In the hand of the ai its a big nerf.
The vassals take too many diplo-slots, which results in France having no significant allies early on, usually only Provence and Scotland. The amount of vassals also means no real coherent army for France, which makes it fairly easy to pick off small stacks. Its considerably easy to win early wars against France as England or Burgundy alone, basically a free-win if you can drag someone like Aragon into the war too.
Agreed. France was much more powerful in older versions.
Spain is doing its usual colonisation game in all my runs.
Yeah, Spain only struggles if they refuse or don't get the IW event, otherwise they are right up there with the wps