Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But the mandala description is still accurate, because it doesn't say that you don't lose dev
Now im wondering whether I should swap to Iqta or the Plutocracy you have when you start as Malacca
Or stay a Mandala
You won't be in the running for a world conquest with that type of government anyway, so rebellious vassals aren't a big deal.
Is there any notable good vassal choices in the Malayan area? Im thinking maybe Indrapura and Palembang once I start moving into Sumatra
Ill try and get a vassal in Java (Bali was eaten by Blambagan and Blambagan is a trib of Maja, so maybe ill snag Bali's province and release them) and Palembang as a vassal once I finish the colony in Sumatra
Along with Ternate ofc
They can expand for you very nicely indeed if you enable them.
I try Brunei, formed Malaya first try
Aboriginals keep attacking Malayan Australia
This. My first 1.33 game my English CN owned all of Australia by 1590, a mere 190-ish years before any settlers arrived irl. And it could easily have been a good 15-20 years earlier if I'd been trying.
Though I plan on colonizing Cali and maybe hit Mexico and SA if I can afterwards
Also I made Aussieland Self Governing, was that the right choice or should I have gone Private Enterprise